Why does Veeky Forums deny Holocaust revisionism?

Why does Veeky Forums deny Holocaust revisionism?

Attached: c1f038f43bd684c3d2585e181a096636.jpg (541x800, 76K)

Because the claims made are unsupported by the evidence presented.

Because it’s tinfoil hat tier.

Attached: 5861B29B-AC1C-4191-96AE-E9DD8D654648.jpg (615x351, 109K)

Mods are useless faggots

>REEEEEEEE A THREAD ABOUT HISTORY THAT I DONT LIKE

You centrist faggots are pathetic

because it got debunked already

Attached: swimming pool claim debunked.png (728x900, 621K)

>3-4 holohoax threads running around
>hurr durr u gaiz r pathetic

excuse me but can you just stop doing that sweetheart

>"Hey Hans mind if I take this photo of ya executing ze Jews?"
>No problem man!
How could this photo even exist at such a close range?

Because most people are smart enough not to fall for poor neo nazi propaganda

>How could this photo even exist at such a close range?
What does the range have to do with anything?

You do realise they had hand holdable cameras in the 40s right?

It's up close and personal on the opposing side of the mass grave. It's a very strange photo with hard to explain circumstances of how it was allowed to be taken.

With an image as clear and stable as that it would at least require something more state of the art and less tacky.

Why wouldn't it? It's not like the Germans had anything to hide since racial cleaseing was a open girl the third Reich why notrecord it?

Also there are thousands of other peices of evidence out there that arnt pictures

Goal of*

Wow you just debunked every war crime photo, good job.

You mean like... a tripod?

I would imagine it being at least more discreet is all.
>It's not like the Germans had anything to hide
It was supposedly a well kept secret from the German public, why would the authorities allow photos be taken that could be leaked to the rest of the world?

>shitposting the same "le just asking questions :)" thread over and over again

>It was supposedly a well kept secret from the German public, why would the authorities allow photos be taken that could be leaked to the rest of the world?
It wasn't though, there are plenty of books that state the Germans all knew about it but did nothing.

If it was done with a tripod that means it couldn't have been done discreetly which begs the question why did the authorities allow it?
Most Germans thought it was a mere relocation.

...because by your post it is revisionism...

fuck off shills the holocaust NEVER happened, unfortunately.

>disputing a single photograph means I'm attempting to debunk something

>If it was done with a tripod that means it couldn't have been done discreetly which begs the question why did the authorities allow it?
Have you considered the idea that it might have been the authorities who took the photo in the first place?
>Most Germans thought it was a mere relocation.
"In the summer and autumn of 1943, Germans began to talk openly about the murder of the Jews, equating it with the Allied bombing of German civilians."
— Page 3 of The German War by Nicholas Stargardt

>why did the authorities allow it
They didn't know about it.

It depends what you mean by authorities, we know that the SS make photos like that even if it was illegal. They wanted souvenirs from war and they really hated Jews.