Logic does not exist

Discuss

Attached: 543A6186-48EE-4C99-BB0D-CFE30519E25B.png (750x1334, 1.96M)

Premise: This is a shitty post
Premise: We shouldn't discuss over shitty posts
Conclusion: Nah

prove it
saged

Assuming logic does not exist from the outside of the interactive scope of that axiom or from the inside?

If inside, then logic inevitably will exist since all impossibilities within the totality negate themselves leaving only possibilities i.e. logic.
However the span of time for this to happen will belong to an imaginary number data set.

As for outside. It is merely an impossibility. We can make negative tautologies about it all day. It will gain us nothing.

>phoneposter hates logic
pottery

>pointing to something is an objective proof the something exists
user...
prove logic exists
oops, that's circular reasoning
Top quality post.
Everyone on Veeky Forums is babby tier when it comes to real philosophy and questioning the premises of questioning as a concept itself.

Are we Kantians, Platonists, Aristotleans

Logic is a collection of ideas. Do ideas "exist"?

>If inside, then logic inevitably will exist since all impossibilities within the totality negate themselves leaving only possibilities i.e. logic.
that's a tautology.

logic exists because we are using it effectively everytime we speak
prove that we are understanding each other by some means other than logic

What is existence?
Is it material in scope?
What is material?
What is the opposite of material?
IS there an opposite of material?
what do you mean when you say "material"? Do you imply anything further within the scope of material or just what you refer to specifically?