Why was africa a backwater continent throughout its history?

Why was africa a backwater continent throughout its history?

Attached: DAFD9E5A-97B3-41DD-9264-859860986E50.png (1175x609, 92K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G_factor_(psychometrics)
youtube.com/watch?v=JWzjn0N9g4g
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_West_Africa
mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/14600/1/MPRA_paper_14600.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

it was the birthplace of the human race user, pretty sure it wasn't a backwater then.

That means nothing.

Yeah and when the humanity left Africa, it became a shithole.

A huge inhospitable desert separating most of it from the rest of the world may have had something to do with it.

What about the Central American civilizations?

And a giant Jungle which to this day parts of haven't even been explored. It's a miracle anyone could make a civilization there..

They were even more primitive shitholes.

The Aztec pyramids were far more impressive than anything that the Mali Empire had to offer.

Low IQ of Negroes.

>/his will unironically deny this

Lack of navigable waterways.

Aren't American Natives supposed to be inferior races too based on this logic? Why did they build civilizations then?

Fuck off, IQ is a social construct

Attached: c62.jpg (546x700, 136K)

Who said anything about an inferior race?

They were far more impressive than anything in Europe at the time, your point?
>Stacking a shit ton of rock for your chimpout sessions isn't an indicator of advancements

Injuns are pretty smart. Just got destroyed by diseases and lack of experience with firewater.

pic related
this thread is bait, OP has legit autism and has been spamming it every day on Veeky Forums with minor alterations to avoid being banned for almost a year, just post this pic which is the succinct infallible rebuttal and don't reply

Attached: africa.png (600x643, 96K)

Cherry picking, cultural determinism, and hardcore wewuzzing by self described white history undergrads teeming with undeserved pride.

>IQ is a social construct
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G_factor_(psychometrics)

American Natives have on average higher IQ than negroes. That explain their civilizations despite being isolated from the rest of the world.

Lmao

Attached: F2391DD3-A584-47E6-8EA6-57440A9F535E.jpg (800x1267, 312K)

>Sahara Desert stopped the flow of Greco-Roman culture to most of the continent
>Coastlines in general made for terrible harbors (too many beaches)
>Rivers had too many waterfalls, so transport of goods and people was hard
>Continent is fucking huge so too many regions, climates, cultures and languages

When will this meme die?

Attached: IMG_2074.jpg (600x360, 66K)

>Muh heat and humidity
>Muh climate
t. Mr. Diamond

Attached: 1511234868926.png (408x450, 35K)

>This one tower from Ethiopia proves than the ENTIRE continent wasn’t backwater.

You can't kill the truth.

Attached: IMG_2869.jpg (800x600, 182K)

Asia has all of the same problems but it didn’t stop them from developing a civilization.

*that

And it's from Ethiopia. That's very different from the ooga booga subsaharan cultures.

Attached: IMG_2870.jpg (800x583, 143K)

>That's very different from the ooga booga subsaharan cultures.

Attached: IMG_2197.jpg (900x664, 267K)

It has literally none of those problems you pleb

The MAIN factor is: subsaharan africans have on average lower IQs and higher time preferences compared to Asians, Europeans, Northern Africans etc.

Attached: IMG_2583.jpg (761x960, 166K)

>Giant dick shaped obelisk
Awesome.

You can keep spamming these pics all you want. But that still doesn’t change the fact that 85% of the continent was still stuck in the Neolithic period.

And everybody knows that. We don't talk for social and political reasons.

>The denial

Attached: 69827282-54D6-4454-80B3-F007F3A3BA74.jpg (361x346, 53K)

Literally what? This was Asia
>Yellow, Yangtze, Mekong, Ganges, Indus, Tigris, Euphrates river valleys with shitloads of high quality soil for irrigation
>Great Eurasian Steppe was a literal highway for trade and movement of peoples with large rideable beasts teaming among it's grasses (Imagine if cars roamed plains of gasoline ffs)
>So many ports it created the biggest maritime trade network in history (Indian ocean trade dwarfed Atlantic trade even to this day)
You could argue the huge continent part but most of it is flat where as Africa is very rugged and high in altitude. Places like SEA which had dense rain forest were close enough to places like China that the advancements diffused.

>subsaharan africans have on average lower IQs
There is no evidence for this. Charles Murray's research is literally funded by pro eugenics white nationalist orgs and Richard Lynn's numbers have been repeatedly exposed as fraudulent .

Attached: IMG_2872.png (811x525, 72K)

All psychometrics research published shows that blacks have lower IQ.
Where is the data that contradicts it?

Every region was about as developed as one would think given the environment and access to outside influence.

Attached: IMG_2584.jpg (735x1032, 157K)

>Charles Murray's research is literally funded by pro eugenics white nationalist orgs

And all school reports and education statistics are funded by cultural marxists. We have a draw.

>iron tools used throughout the continent
>neolithic
thinking

Horseshit

Answer
youtube.com/watch?v=JWzjn0N9g4g

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_West_Africa

Attached: download (4).jpg (191x263, 8K)

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_West_Africa

West Africa. The Iron industry, in both smelting and forging for tools and weapons, appeared in Sub-Saharan Africa by 1200 BCE,

Attached: 1520812293950.jpg (141x622, 10K)

Show me something that proves a genetic explanation that isn't by a right-winger or politically motivated research.

When you look at Nigerians in the US and U.K, they are some of the highest achievers and more educated.

Selection doesn't explain it because immigration isn't anywhere near that selective to explain these results. If people like Lynn were correct, this level of achievement should be possible.

Attached: IMG_2874.png (750x1334, 173K)

Nok Culture

*this level of achievement shouldn't be possible

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_West_Africa

Attached: africa_empires.png (600x579, 415K)

ITT: poltards get destroyed yet again

Debatable, and that sword surely wasn't made in 1200 bc

Bantu expansion stupid

It's still iron working afrom pagan Nigeria

No one said that

It's a medieval african swords

Cogolese iron exicution blade

Attached: 2662m-151170-29-african-tribal-art-weapon.jpg (1000x1000, 79K)

Attached: slave-traid.png (490x408, 108K)

Theirs also like only major river valley the Niger were west african civilizations formed

You know that graph proves nothing right ?

Just posting that doesn't really say anything
These empires we're formed by sonnike mande and niger-congo speakers

The sahelian empires we're formed through dominating the Saharan trade

It's a very curious phenomenon how American Blacks can't accept their past. I never saw indians here in Brazil inventing stories about their "empires", "states" etc.

Tichitt and djenne predate Arab contact also Europeans had far more Arabic Contact

Attached: great-zimbabwe-gate.jpg (575x431, 89K)

Zimbabwe

Attached: b2e6d7e03b9f20b7b7159ae7540344c3.jpg (640x427, 109K)

Ruins of khami City

Attached: 193-khami-ruins-25-1407486781.jpg (992x744, 200K)

These aren't fake

You saying it's not true don't make it false

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_West_Africa

You know there's recorded history of these empires and states right?
Mali was even on European maps like the Catalan atlas

Attached: images (48).jpg (268x188, 16K)

Jewish lies

Google Bantu expansion

The didn't even get to the iron age

Attached: StormniggersArguingLike.png (1600x1000, 29K)

Yeah, and an ape banging rocks used to be the most advanced thing on the planet. Great job staying the same for hundreds of thousands of years.

How is a Jewish lie?

Attached: e691cd2e90f98d70217126e37001e2eb--meme-faces-troll-face.jpg (236x236, 13K)

Lol what? So your explanation for African achievement (Pure nigerian who are not admixed no less!) is that Marxists are rigging the scores? This level of denial...

Attached: IMG_2875.png (647x302, 83K)

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_West_Africa

Written by Spanish scholars

Can you point to the time when Africa was the most developed? Because I'm pretty sure it was during the banging of rocks times.

Doesn't have to be to prove my point development is linear the world isn't a game of civs

As for selection among African immigrants, it is obvious and enormous. To use Nigerian immigrants to the US as an example, 58.6% have college degrees and 28.3% had graduate degrees. Among Nigerians as a whole, less than 10% have college degrees. The immigrants are therefore a highly non-representative selection of the Nigerian population.

You could say the same about indian migrants

>plus countless post in this thread
You're samefagging in multiple threads for several days now. Why? I guess negligence of African history really pisses you of but face it, 20 years of a devoted Illyrian autist implementing one time system had more influence on the world and was far more interesting than the entirety of African history, the only reason we even know about this was that arabs were at least kind enough to write about them.

So why do Richard Lynns numbers correlate with PISA scores so well if they were completely fabricated? It would be quite the coincidence if he could predict PISA scores by pure guesses.

>The general correpondence of means of educational IQ, PISA IQ and
Lynn-Vanhanen IQ should not be a complete surprise. Rindermann (2007)
had already found a correlation of .78 across countries between mean IQ and
educational level of young adults, operationalized by an index composed of
three measures: 1. adult literacy rate 1991; 2. percentage of persons between
12 and 19 years old 1960 – 1985, having graduated from secondary school;
and 3. the mean of years of schooling of persons 25 years or older for 1990,
1995 and 2000.
Generally, the differences between Lynn-Vanhanen IQ, PISA IQ and
Educational IQ do not exceed plus or minus two points. Whereas LynnVanhanen
IQ is based on IQ-tested samples (in some countries even on a
single, small and local sample), and PISA IQ is based on large and
representative samples of schoolchildren, Educational IQ is based on data of
the total adult population. Data on educational attainment, scaled as
Educational IQ, and PISA results do confirm, in most cases within the limits
of measurement error, the results of a century of IQ testing, summarized by
Lynn and Vanhanen (2002, 2006). Whoever active in the field of
educational economy had everimagined such a possibility?

mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/14600/1/MPRA_paper_14600.pdf

Well Indians on average are better educated and of higher average intelligence so no, you cant.

>When you look at Nigerians in the US and U.K, they are some of the highest achievers and more educated.
>Selection doesn't explain it
Of course it does. Also you do see a more important regression to the mean among african immigrants than, say, indians.

Let's say the average IQ in Nigeria is 85. That means theres around 30 million Nigerians with IQ >100. Plenty of room for the obvious selection that's taking place.

Most Indians aren't educated well educated only the very wealthy can afford to send thier kids over seas also half the country dose not use tiolets

The average india I is 82

You do realize that you didnt build any of those? The empires that captured you from the jungle and sold you off to slavery did.

That's only if you lump all african migrants together Somalians are different from Nigerians

UK and US Nigerian Americans are at least 100. Racialists think that pure blacks are what, 65-70? The selection effect would have to be so extreme, you're entering fantasy territory.

It also doesn't help that Nigerians are closest genetically to pure blacks and also that there hasn't been a correlation found at all between IQ and white admixture.

No, I'm talking about Nigerians specifically. Second generation nigerians in the USA don't do out of the ordinary well, althought they do better than american blacks.

They did every historical account says so ruled by black kings Sudanic africa means land of the blacks