Was he a fascist?

Was he a fascist?

Attached: IMG_7040.jpg (1250x1600, 387K)

No.

Nope, fascism is totalitarian whereas Pinochet was an authoritarian free marketer.

Yes

No, he was a neoliberal.

Who cares, he was based as fuck. Only butthurt commie SJWs hate him.

Yes.

There are elements of free markets in socialist countries, which would have been the unavoidable result of any lasting fascist regime anyway. Just as in other countries with originally totalitarian/socialist tendencies.

Not even remotely.

No in any way.

>There are elements of free markets in socialist countries, which would have been the unavoidable result of any lasting fascist regime anyway. Just as in other countries with originally totalitarian/socialist tendencies.
Not the same thing. Totalitarism means a government that encroaches in all aspects of society: the media, sports, religion, the economy, social relations, and so on.

Pinochet was an old fashioned authoritarian military dictator, not a fascist.

>If you don't like dictators who torture people for thoughtcrimes you're a butthurt commie SJW

>Was he a fascist?
No, unless you want to redefine Fascism.

THIS, but unironically.

He was Boris Yeltsin with less vodka and more uniforms

implyng based pinochet was a degenerate like yeltSIN

No he just gets correlated with it because Chile likes to steal German military imagery.

No, and neither was Salazar.

>any authoritarian governmental system that doesn't claim to be communist is fascism
NO NO NO NO NO, STOP THIS BEFORE I KILL MYSELF

Salazar did have a picture of Mussolini on his desk so that's harder to tell

>gives a shit about ideology and just kill everyone who opposes him
>free market because lol money
>support extreme right wing movements just because they hate leftists
>dress like Hitler because it looks cool
>adopt german aesthetics because Chile always had german military instructors and uniforms

Just a good ol' plain dictatorship dude. He never talked about some bullshit "le ebin chilean race" or something about the state needs to encompass everything, etc.

No, he was just an authoritarian ruler.
a fascist ruler is authoritarian by default but puts emphasis on corporativism and all the "one with the state, and the state with one" babble, like said.

he sertainly had fashin

I can't stand people who make an idol out of Pinochet

Attached: ac.png (779x898, 31K)

tell that to the basque people.

no, he didnĀ“t bother with building a political mass movement and applied neoliberal economic policies

No. He was far more disgusting.