What if USSR joined the Axis?

It would be a nightmare for the British. The USSR, Germany, and Italy could easily coordinate to seize:

1) Afghanistan, Iran, and India, cutting off Britain from her "crown jewel"

2) Through Turkey, seize Syria and Iraq, cutting off key sources of oil for the British. Then, proceed to Saudi Arabia and Yemen to cut off shipping.

3) Invade Egypt from East and West, then seize the rest of Africa, cutting off key raw materials.

The British would be starved of resources and inevitably collapse into civil war, right?

Attached: USSR AXis.png (1280x623, 550K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov–Ribbentrop_Pact
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German–Soviet_Axis_talks
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

General Armchair strikes again

dude what if fascists and communists, both of whom would fight the other till one group is extinct, like teamed up man? now, pass me that bong, i gotta tell the boys on Veeky Forums all about it!

>dude what if fascists and communists, both of whom would fight the other till one group is extinct, like teamed up man?
To deal with a common enemy first? If Hitler was rational, this is what he would have done. Germany could never win a war on two fronts, so any hope of victory would involve taking out the British first before dealing with the USSR.

The USSR was in the Axis, unofficially

Please explain why the fuck Britain or the US would be considered an enemy of the USSR before the Nazis?

Anti-imperialism is the core of Marxist-Leninist ideology. In Stalin's writings, the British empire is treated with particular venom, since it oppressed hundreds of millions via colonialism.

Before Germany invaded the USSR, the Comintern instructed Communist parties to oppose WW2 as an imperialist war, just like WW1.

Stalin was also pissed off at the British for refusing to ally against Germany, which is why he signed the M-R pact in the first place.

Before Barbarossa, Stalin was feeding Germany with resources because he wanted a counter-balance against the British, the #1 world power at the time.

Because the capitalist powers hated, HATED, that a nation broke free of their yolk and the power of capital. Capitalists cannot stand if the workers gain power so they do whatever they must to crush them. From the USSR, to Vietnam, to Cuba, to Chile, this has been the one truth of the last century.

Seriously, it'd be as crazy as Capitalists and Communists teaming up. Or Monarchists and Republicans

reasons why the soviets ade a deal with the captist democracys instead:

uk and usa didnt explicitly plan on depopulating and colonizing 2/3rds of their county

uk and usa actually treated treaties and agreements more than toilet paper, which means they never had to worry about getting stabbed in the back

germany was a less powerful country than england, by far. the uk ruled the seas, and was backed by
half the colonies in the world, givingjer limitless resources. the german economy was relatively strong, but anglo R&D was streets ahead.

Eastern Europe and Germany were worth 10x as much as the indian subcontinent, why settle for a shitty consolation prize? Same reason italy joined entente

these are all the ones i thought off the top of my head