>vegan
>natty
>jacked
>red pilled gf
face it Veeky Forums, this is the man you really want to be
The TRUE king of Veeky Forums
Charles Scott
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
sciencealert.com
twitter.com
Isaiah Parker
why would i want to be vegan
Nicholas Taylor
i don't care about pigs. neither should you.
Eli Perez
You should. Being an amoral autist is not something to be proud of
Jace Russell
who is this alton brown looking motherfucker
Christian Evans
It's only amoral if you extend morality beyond humans and their needs. I'd argue that if you demonstrated that veganism were genuinely achievable in a way that were healthier than eating a balanced diet (protip we're not there yet) then we should exterminate the animals kept for food use their remains for fertilizer and replace the animal farms with either vegetation farming or something else useful for human society.
Brandon Smith
building an arbitrary moral wall around humans is retarded. Would you torture a dog? would you torture a chimpanzee? would you torture a neanderthal? If not then you don't believe in building an arbitrary moral wall around humans
John Fisher
>Would you torture a dog or a chimpanzee
Not pointlessly, if there were a tangible benefit to it for society then yes.
>Arbitrary wall
Humans developed morality as it exists, you are attempting to apply this human created morality to creatures incapable of thought whose very existence at this point in history is largely the result of their value to us as food pets work animals etc. Vegans and environmentalists in general seem to believe it moral to put animals and the environment above human needs and desires with no logical reasoning as to the why and yet don't understand why everybody else thinks them a cult.
Hunter Howard
why wouldn't you torture a chimpanzee if you say nonhumans have no moral value?
Brayden Hall
Why would I? What value does it add to me or others? My entire point is that morality doesn't exist in a vacuum and its purpose is to help human society advance itself and its members. Applying the same morality to animals you would to humans is not only pointless but detrimental insofar as their existence is predicated on their usefulness to society (as work animals, pets and food). I wouldn't support or enact pointless suffering upon animals but while killing the animals has benefit to us I will continue to advocate for it