Who are some notable right wing anti capitalists?

t. judeo-baboon

>he mad at muh freedoms!
you speak volumes without knowing what you are saying

>Evola
Edgelord

>Who are some notable right wing anti-capitalists?
Hitler.

>If you believe in muh natural hierarchies, muh rule of the best
Spotted the retarded communist. Hierarchies are part of natural law, everything in nature falls into one. See: Pareto Distribution or Zipf's Law as examples.

> then why are that those capitalist elites not your betters?
Capitalist elites are when they get there via capitalism and not state interference. A person a the top of a free market system can only stay at the top by out competing all of their competition and providing goods in services that the market place both need and wants. Corporatism and Communism are terrible because the person at the top monopolizes and oppress the bottom with violence via the state. Hierarchies always happen and is the main reason why communism will never work in any way shape of form.

>
>Some right-wingers oppose capitalism because they don’t the commodification of culture, the parasitic rentiers and the breakdown of traditional mores caused by creative destruction.
This.

Attached: Pareto Distribution.png (325x219, 13K)

But I don't dispute the existence of hierarchies, you leftist retard in denial. Jusy point out the hypocrisy in thpse who praise natural hierarchies yet arbitrarily decide le capitalist rulers are not an actual natural hierarchy.
And indeed hierarchies happen naturally, that's why feudalism and aristocratic rule get replaced with capitalism.

Conservatism almost by definition is pro capitalist. So you're going to have to strain here.

>capitalism
>natural hierarchies
good one

not really, there were financial traditions before capitalism that one could "conserve"

>Jusy point out the hypocrisy in thpse who praise natural hierarchies yet arbitrarily decide le capitalist rulers are not an actual natural hierarchy.
Quit agreeing with me, faggot:
>Capitalist elites are when they get there via capitalism and not state interference.

>Conservatism almost by definition is pro capitalist.
Nope. Conservatism in the United States is about conserve the constitution, it has nothing to do with what form of economy. It just seems like it's pro free market because the only real alternative to capitalism right now is socialism and socialism in the United States is unconstitutional. If American conservatives were actually concerned with free markets then government spending wouldn't constantly go up under them. In Europe conservatism is more based around preserving tradition.

>American education

>not really, there were financial traditions before capitalism that one could "conserve"
Yeah, but those days are long over. Capitalism is the orthodox establishment now.

No one but the fringeist fringe of conservatives are sincerely 1700s style pro monarchist or want a Catholic theocratic government.

>No one but the fringeist fringe of conservatives are sincerely 1700s style pro monarchist or want a Catholic theocratic government.

Maybe in the Anglosphere, but there are plenty of monarchist and traditionalist parties which are comparatively influential in continental Europe.

In Brazil and Mexico too.

As we all know, capitalism destroys culture, which is why the Dutch have never produced any paintings of note.

Thomas Carlyle was so anti-capitalist that he defended slavery
When the KMT was prominent on Mainland China they had a tendency to mistreat merchants and on of the Three Principles of the People can be interpreted in such a way to be anticapitalist
The Southern Agrarians and some American Paleoconservatives starting in the 80s
The Japanese militarists and ultra nationalists targeted liberal politicians and capitalists in the time leading up to their seizure of power.
The French Right of the Third Republic and the Legitimists during the July Monarchy probably also count.

A big problem with a lot of these definitions is how they would be right wing anti-capitalists depending on what the specific thinkers thought capitalism was. You can find many thinkers who believed in a completely free market system with property rights but just didn't like industrialization, and therefore would write about the evils of "capitalism" when they just meant industrialism.

Conservatism does not describe an actual set of principles and has never done such. It's a set of political prejudices.

Attached: de-nachtwacht-rembrandt-van-rijn.jpg (795x564, 643K)

The entire USSR post lenin.

I'm not the one blaming an economic system for social mores being degraded or culture being more accessible or le parasitic rentiers, user.

Conservatism is just conserving whatever the status quo is. The current establishment of the Chinese communist party could be considered conservative. In the US conservatives are people who want to conserve the founding enlightenment ideals which in other countries would be considered liberal.

Conservatism is not left or right wing. In fact very little politically active people are actually conservative, most conservatives do not even vote.