Philosophical debate

In the first place, nihilism is the lack of fundamental values and beliefs.

>you can't convince them
If you don't talk about that case, how are we supposed to tell you how to overcome it? In the first paragraph, I showed you how nihilism englobes a lot of situations.

nietszche said that nihilism was self-negating, which is essentially what OP implied
if you have to basically argue that it's likely that neither argument is even possible then you've negated your own argument

That didn't answer my question. I asked nihilistic about what.

Remarking definitions to invalidates someone's point is defined as "arguing". Are you a pseud?

I've seen to many people around here talking about nihilism without knowing what it actually means.

First, what's your purpose?
Then, explain the preference's process of thought. How does the guy choose between possible explanations of daily events?

Where is the nihilism?

>pseud
rei fucking leave

I'll fucking kill you, m8.

I'm not that retarded kiddo.

>where is the nihilism

In the logical conclusion that because the truth value of a statement should be regarded as irrelevant by this standard that any truth value is equally irrelevant no matter how practical it is under any category. The very essence of nihilism.

Is this what you're talking about OP?

youtube.com/watch?v=9kEdMAh0aPI

Irrelevant to what.
Are you talking out of your ass?

Both of them are wrong.

That nerd stomps the religious retard, and Nietzsche stomps atheists and science lovers.