Villainous hero, or heroic villain?

Villainous hero, or heroic villain?

Attached: p01grff7-.jpg (1920x1080, 245K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/s0DrMUKwy4o?t=1399
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

A piece of shit who is burning in hell now

Also this is a Romanov thread now

Attached: Tsar's_family (1).jpg (2000x1684, 1.15M)

Take out hero from each answer and you have the answer

Attached: DE7jUuWXcAAzXLl.jpg (1200x827, 157K)

A heroic hero to some, a villainous villain to a few, an interesting and impressive figure to most.

Not pictured: starving peasant children

>implying that soviet russia doesn't have starving peasant children
t. commie

So peasant children were starving so the logical step is to shoot the Tsars children

>implying that Soviet Russia didn't inherit a shit situation from a completely inept czarist bureaucracy

They were next in line to become Czars. As Michael Corleone said, it was strictly business.

>whataboutism
All monarchists deserve to die.