Monarchy will outlive democracy

Saying that democracy is worse than communism makes you a communist.

Communism is the worst system of rule known to man. After technocracy.

>Communism is the worst system of rule known to man
you lack imagination

Democracy is a means of governance, Communism is an economic ideology. They are not mutually exclusive.

too many pepes for today's

Attached: 02f.jpg (655x527, 34K)

Democracy is the delusion system
Everyone think they have some deciding power, but they don't, it is the money and power behind the scenes that decide who will win
Not to mention that >90% of the people don't have competence to decide anything within the country's business

>muh democracy is the best 4ever
Don't worry, when everyone's living in contractual-constitutional states, while many of them will be monarchies, there will be a few democracies then, too.

Communism is not a "system of rule" you mongoloid mutt. Communism is an economic system. A Communist nation can be ruled by a dictator, parlaiment or any other means of governance. Learn something of politics before you try to talk about them idiot.

Also
>Saying that democracy is worse than communism makes you a communist
This is the reasoning of a lower-spectrum autist. If I say Nazism was worse than Communism am I a Nazi? If I say Latinas are less hot than Asians do I love Asians?

>Emperors didn't constantly have to circlejerk about how good they were.
This is a history board, sir.

Attached: MuhVictory+.jpg (525x340, 39K)

Society will always favor individuals over more abstract shared power systems. Individuals have potential, they don't have the same level of corruption or baggage inherent in a mature democracy. They can come in and change things that the status que will never touch.

Attached: download.jpg (182x277, 10K)

>they don't have the same level of corruption or baggage inherent in a mature democracy
>Using a jingoistic nepotist as an example

I don't think you could make the case that he was more corrupt than a sufficiently mature democracy, which always has a fairly high baseline of corruption. I'm not saying he was innocent or free of corruption, mind you.

Hello American. Let's catch you up to speed since your education system has made you dumb.

Means of governance:
Democracy
Monarchy
Dictatorship
Autocracy
Technocracy

Economic systems:
Communism
Capitalism
Socialism

Please remember that these things are not mutually exclusive and you can mix and match any pair of means of governance and economic systems to make whatever whacky government you want! Thanks for stopping by, don't come again.

Hoppe backs up your point when he talked about the difference between a democratically elected leader with a set term and a monarch. "Every head of state, be they a monarch or a president will use their power to advance their personal wealth. A president is in the mindset that 'Since I am in office for a limited time I must loot the state as quickly and effectively as possible'. An endless succession of presidents who are all inherintly in this mindset of effective looting leave a state barren. A monarch does not have this mindset for he is in office for life. He advances his wealth here and there but does not devestate the nation like a president does."

Thank you. As a fellow American I can safely say thank you for educating this fine gentleman. I would have done it myself but I’m far too busy reading a book right now.

This is what we’d call a ‘pseud’ in America, I don’t know what country you’re from, hahaha! Anyway he probably still doesn’t understand the difference between socialism and communism.

You also forgot to list ‘ohclocracy’, which can happen in interim states or at the extreme end of democracy. Hopefully this will help you educate this ‘pseud’ and he will learn the error of his ways!

See you later, friend!

>Emperor didn't constantly have to circlejerk about how good they were.
Yes they did. The biggest fucking circlejerk lead to World War I and by consequence WWII. I rather live in a Republic than a Monarchy which leads to that type of clusterfuck.

>Emperors didn't constantly have to circlejerk about how good they were

Attached: 1512389227776.jpg (645x729, 81K)

Yeah that user was dumb but let's go through these means of governance. Your economic systems are sadly lacking a bunch of different systems, but that's neither here nor there.

Why would democracy not be the best system? The rest require an absolute rule with a possible exception of technocracy. Barring a total democracy.. republics seem to get the job done in every first world country on Earth barring a couple. Thats far closer to democracy than any other system you listed.

>Emperors didn't constantly have to circlejerk about how good they were.
They did this all the fucking time.

>After technocracy.
How would we know? Forget "that's not real communism", no one as even attempted to put all governance in the hands of scientists.

Scientists are utilitarian by default and governance by them would possibly be utilitarian which is super easy to break down with hypotheticals.

How you WANT to govern generally falls flat when you slam into the brick wall that is the reality of governing. Something every idealist who gets into office ends up learning.

>Emperors didn't constantly have to circlejerk about how good they were.
haha