Why does only Europeans and their descendants in America seems to be" capable" of inventing new things?

Ah, ok
>Britain
Nordic
>France
mutt
>Germany
Nordic
>Italy
North is Nordic

Germanic != Nordic

Nordic = Of the Nordic race.

Attached: Rassenkarte_von_Europa.jpg (970x863, 173K)

Racial superiority

I can't believe this thread went further that this post.
guess it didn't fit the view of OP

Large Jewish populations.

Look into Isreal and how it was famine their poor in the 50s and full of Jews from slav nations or Arab Jews, and became developed in just a decade anyways.

Attached: 1520987348834.jpg (1346x2800, 1.34M)

Makes sense.

Attached: IQADD.jpg (346x320, 36K)

like the aryan or romans and greeks western european did their duty as the supreme gods of this planet

Japan has been leading the world in patents for some time I believe.

Because they invented the culture of inventing new things. It doesn't mean only they were capable, but that recognition as a significant person was based on several factors that were based on the culture of the Enlightenment.

One of these was print. If you were published - and referenced by other published works - you were significant. This was easier in Enlightenment era Europe as many could be self-published due to the cheap cost of printing.

Another was intellectual competition and recognition. Private societies emerged in this era in Europe to recognize these writers, host debates, and reward the best.

And there was also the knowledge economy and book market, allowing these writers to make an actual living off their work by leveraging their renown among their own societies to sell books to wealthy amateurs and regular readers.

There are others, but these and other aspects all existed in some form among other advanced cultures at the time. The scale of Enlightenment era Europe's printing and knowledge economy however was massive, and this helped compound the effect exponentially. And European authors were heavily favored because they were being read and debated by their fellow Europeans whereas anyone writing in Chinese or Arabic would require a translation.

what advantages have indo european nothing they conquer by his sole presence
greeks and romans were unique civilization in their political organization phylosophy techology ,literature,the manner of see the world ....
and then western european simply follow the steps of their ancestors
If you put europeans in other place of the planet the same thing would have happened
its not and accident that not one but thre times europeans have wake up to lead the world

Any actual response to this or "it doesn't count" nonsense?

Attached: patent by country.jpg (910x661, 47K)

Attached: papers by country.jpg (1386x887, 207K)

dont be so arrogant it may be true that europeans have done a lot but the things are changing

>European Union
The whole thing? All countries? Jesus, this is pathetic.

You shouldn't reply to dumb bait posts.

Northern Italians aren't nordic in any sense of the word, and even that old typological map shows they aren't either in the sense you mean.

Did France or Britain even have large Jewish populations within that time frame? Italy's Jewish population is old, but rather small.

Also Jews weren't emancipated for most of that history, so they wouldn't be represented.

The developed world has already hit the "peak" and can only grow slowly.

They are emancipated now.

>As of 2017, Nobel Prizes[note 1] have been awarded to 892 individuals,[1] of whom 201 or 22.5% were Jews,[note 2] although the total Jewish population comprises less than 0.2% of the world's population.[2] This means the percentage of Jewish Nobel laureates is at least 112.5 times or 11,250% above average.
>Ashkenazi Jews have won more than one quarter of Fields Medals, Turing Awards and Regeneron Science Talent Search awards. People of Ashkenazi Jewish descent or origin are also disproportionately represented among world chess champions (54 percent) [6], National Medal of Science recipients (37 percent), U.S. Nobel Prize winners (29 percent) [4], and Nobel laureates in medicine or physiology (42 percent)[6]. Furthermore, Jews comprise up to one third of the student populace at Ivy League schools, [5] and 30 percent of U.S. Supreme Court law clerks.[7]
>Ashkenazi Jews have also had disproportionate success in non-academic fields such as business and commerce. According to the 1931 census of Poland, Jews comprised 9.8 percent of the Polish population but controlled 22.4 percent of the wealth in the country.[7] Despite their small population, Ashkenazi Jews in Poland also owned 55 percent of large and medium-sized commercial businesses in 1938 and dominated the textile, chemical, food, transportation, paper manufacturing, and building material industries.[7]

AH and Vienna, in particular, was the scientific and cultural capital of the world. I really don't understand what kind of shit history are people on this board reading.

Are of Jewish descent yourself, or are you that weird philosemitic guy?

You can't draw any meaningful conclusions from that data.

I'm just impressed by their achievements.

Attached: gdp by country.jpg (570x373, 23K)

>which country is more populous, the chart
Congratulations, genius.

Attached: economy by history.jpg (595x495, 64K)

when you start for so low is easy to grow fast but then look at japan or other western countries

meme grafick roman empire 3 times lower than china or india is a joke

Attached: project economy by country.jpg (499x285, 115K)

Attached: IQ by country.png (665x390, 22K)

>AH and Vienna, in particular, was the scientific and cultural capital of the world
Ihr Schluchtenscheisser könnt doch net so dumm sein.

China's sole achievement is breeding like rabbits. Per capita, it's a shithole and it made no major contributions. Stop trying to satisfy your hapa inferiority syndrome by spamming meaningless photos.

have more than 1 billion people is not as good thing at it seems especially in india

I don't speak German.

Christ, why are chinks so insecurity?

If you can't offer proper rebuttal its best to not respond. These are just reactionary responses without proper thought behind them, atleast take a second to think through and respond with facts and argument with some merit.

why are you ?

The over billion people in China provide them with more issues than it provides for, and was entirely a result of Mao's autism.
>If we have more people, more of them will survive the nuclear war and thus we can survive and dominate after a nuclear war.

Attached: 1520464787135.jpg (607x608, 249K)

jews are irrelevant they need western civilizations to achieve anything and when they achieve it, it is through nepotism.

jews need white people, white people don't need jews

Are you retarded? You post GDP at PPP, not even GDP per person at PPP, when the only thing that matters is median income per person at PPP. The only thing your graph shows is that China and India are populous.

You already got the responses, you braindead chink. GDP is population depended. If you look at per capita data, then China isn't better off than Iraq. Patents are a wide term and can encompass all kinds of irrelevant bullshit and you'd need more specific and detailed data to make sense of it. Technology-wise, China is basically a huge sweat shop while the actual tech is coming from the West. Showing number of science papers is also population depended and you'd need to analyse the quality of said papers and the reputation of the journals publishing them.

maybe because they are denigrating european history culture and traditions and want to exterminate us to never recover again maybe we are a little defensive but thats what happen when all the people want a piece of you

>through nepotism
Yup, whites never do this, lol.

not as the same escale as jews thats for sure

And that's why they were so afraid of Jews and banned them from public life until 19th century?

if we really were so nationalistic you would have wiped out before the middle ages

we value competition

nobody likes parasites

One of the major reason of the success of Western civilization (and also of its current downfall) is that it has the lowest in-group preference of all cultural areas.

Attached: I Wonder Who Is Behind These Posts.gif (452x523, 3K)

It's like listening to an African try to explain that his country is shit because wypipo. Be a man and face the reality, Jews are the higher breed.

>we value competition
>be so afraid of Jews you ban them from public life

The thread isn't about PPP or per capita or population. Its about which hemisphere dominates which.

Clearly Asia has always dominated in the past and only lagged behind the last 2-3 centuries. Now they're set to return the world to its old order. Asia will once again dominate the world.

When the argument is lost, you have moved the goal post. In fact, even if you have moved the goal post, it won't matter as these countries in Asia are rapidly growing to first world level. Give it 2 or 3 more decade and most of the Asian countries will be caught up to the first world and some may even have surpassed them.

Are you the one who made this video? Be honest now, don't lie.
youtube.com/watch?v=Xl0b2LGf9jM

Asia never dominated, it's just the largest continent and you seem to obsess over that.

>hurrr durrr the jews were kicked out because they were the best

they don't play by the rules, ever. that's why they were kicked out

you'd have a point if we were living in jewish civilizations. we aren't. they need us we never needed them.

>be a small group of persecuted people
>constant pogroms
>full emancipation in Europe achieved only in late 19th century
>less than 50 years
>dominate the academia, finances, entertainment industries, the most powerful country in history is basically your bitch, thrive in every system - from communism to capitalism
>i-it's nepotism, there is nothing special about Jews, it doesn't matter they are much more intelligent than whites

Individual rights and free market capitalism primarily. Though Europe is falling off in this regard.

Where does 95% of advancements and medicine come from? The one country with a bit of freedom remaining in healthcare. The USA.

Denial is strong in this one. World bank and historians already closed this matter a century ago.

Yup, because whites play by the rules.
>partition countries when they are the weakest
>send Lenin to Russia
>betray Napoleon
Those honorable Western Europeans!

Stem cell research and gene modification research faces quite a bit of strict regulations in the US due to religious/conservative morals.

This is why countries outside of US like China is dominating the cloning/gene modification research.

if you dont integrate and your only focus is subverting the country that you live in you are not welcome as simple as that if you put jewish interest first of the national interest you must be expelled like hundred times before

>give each others jobs
>countries become shitholes full of non whites

now bow down kike, you are nothing without christian civilization. you are nothing without europeans.

Jews already control the media and the economy. So they are already integrated.

ones of the reason why usa is destroying itself

that's called right of conquest

something an inferior jew can't understand, I mean it's pretty clear they know they're weak pussies, in every part of the world the conqueror is the male, you are what your father is because the world values strength and conquest but not the jews nooooooooo, the males are betas for them, you are what your mother is for them. this is the mantality of a beta people.

Literally Eurocentrism
Let's have a look of the methodology

Inevitably, any cutoff point has an element of the arbitrary. My choice was to
draw the line at 50 percent. Everyone who is mentioned in at least 50 percent
of the qualified sources is designated a significant figure and enters the samples
for analysis in the rest of the book. The technical considerations behind the
choice of 50 percent are discussed in Appendix 2, but they come down to a
search for a balance between the competing goals of large sample size and
high sample stability.

So what are these qualified sources?

Some examples of mathematics
G. E. Owen. 1971. The Universe of the Mind. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
H. Eves. 1990. An Introduction to the History of Mathematics. Philadelphia: Saunders
College Publishing.
J. Gullberg. 1997. Mathematics from the Birth of Numbers. New York: WW Norton.
L. Hogben. 1960. Mathematics in the Making. London: Macdonald.
M. Kline. 1972. Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times. New York:
Oxford University Press.
C. B. Boyer and U.C. Merzbach. 1989. A History of Mathematics. New York: John
Wiley & Sons.
F. J. Swetz. 1994. From Five Fingers to Infinity. Chicago: Open Court.

First we can see that sources dating back to the 1960s or 1970s will not have as large a roster of non-western mathematicians

>if you dont integrate and your only focus is subverting the country that you live in you are not welcome as simple as that
Are you talking about Germans or Jews?

Furthermore the references are based on the number of times a name is appeared, which will necessarily be affected by the literary decisions of the book. For example, with a primary Western narrative, Euclid will be mentioned multiple times, giving him a 2nd place our of all mathematicians, despite the only reason it is so is because The Elements is the elementary math book for 20 centuries. On the other hand, Indian mathematicians such as Brahmagupta and Chinese mathematical works such as The Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art, are ranked much worse, firstly due to the few medieval and modern Indian mathematicians that can remention Brahmagupta, and secondly due to the difficulty of certifying the actual author, as in the case of the Nine chapters on the mathematical art..

Another thing is the idea of independent discovery, for the majority of the sources, the Pythagorean Theorem will be credited to Pythagoras primarily despite independent discoveries in India and China, which will be mentioned far fewer times.

Furthermore, it is written that
The two great categories of human accomplishment that I have
omitted from the inventories are commerce and governance.

Of course, even after accounting for these inaccuracies, Western Europe should still come out on top, but the distribution should be far less extreme.

Yes, the president is a Jewish persona. Jewish wife, Jewish family, Jewish sons. The entire right wing is under Jewish control at this moment.

US is a goner.

>christian civilization
You know you're worshiping a Jew?

Dont you think people in china look to the chinese mathematicians and indian look to the indian mathematicians. Fuck off you stupid SJW

he's christian

I don't know about Chinese, but Indians do look to Indian mathematicians. In fact, many of the key mathematical principles we learn today are from Indian mathematicians. Including the very basis for the number system and the concept of 0.

Firstly, they actually do look to the mathematicians of their respective countries.
Secondly, the graph will be right if its called the most INFLUENTIAL figures, but it is not necessarily accurate in terms of the academic significance of their work.

jews take pride in crying and whining about their fate.

the next frontier is drawing itsef the will to survive is strong is eastern europe and russia

For the Chinese, they look at guns/compass/paper/printing. The so called 4 great inventions that make/break modern world.

For example, in China the pythagoras theorem is called Gougu theorem and pascals triangle as yang hui triangle
and also 4 inventions without a clear inventor, so they would not appear in the study

all this delusion just shows how bitter you are to not be white.

face it bucko, whites are the best inventors, the best discoveres, the best pioneers, you're living in a white made world. you just won't admit it because it will shatter your shit ego.

>Of course, even after accounting for these inaccuracies, Western Europe should still come out on top, but the distribution should be far less extreme.
This, China stagnated inevitably after the Song Dynasty, but how a supposed book about Human accomplishment that doesn't mention Han Fei or Shang Yang goes straight into the trash, considering how they are very influential being partially responsible that the west even got the concept of meritocracy.

>Of course, even after accounting for these inaccuracies, Western Europe should still come out on top, but the distribution should be far less extreme.
>Western Europe should still come out on top

Individualism means you want to take credit for yourself. Collectivism means your inventions become state inventions.

This argument isn't discarding the invention but rather the person behind it.

It's based solely on Western sources. I bet it also ignores many Slavic inventors and scientists.

All Chinese inventions are jokes.
China did not invent paper, printing, gunpowder, compass.

1) Egypt invented paper(papyrus) 5000 years ago.
Papyrus is defined as paper.
The English word paper was derived from the word papyrus.
Papyrus - Wikipedia

China started to use animal bones as "paper" 3000 years ago.
Oracle bone - Wikipedia

There were a number of civilizations invented paper, example, Maya.
Maya codices - Wikipedia

2) Middle East invented writing 5000 years ago.
Middle East invented printing 5000 years ago.
It was before the Chinese history.

Johannes Gutenberg invented Printing press, (the machine).

3) Greece invented gunpowder.
Greek fire, its chief ingredient was saltpeter and sulfur, making it an early form of gunpowder.

China was ruled by Manchurian tribe for 300 years till 1911.
The population rate was 1 million Manchus VS 100 million Chinese.
Manchu conquest of China - Wikipedia

Manchus had the right of the first night in China.
Queue Order
When the Manchus defeated China, Chinese men were forced to wear a queue or they would be killed.

The world did not wait for China to invent the gunpowder.

5) Italy invented the compass.
The pointer of the ancient Chinese compass was as big as a spoon.
The spoon was put on a board, with nothing else.
Compass, Wikipedia
History of the compass, Wikipedia, (Chinese Compass "Si Nan", photo

2) Chinese declare that the Chinese treasure ship was the most advanced ship hundreds years ago.
It was a punt ship. It was not advanced.
Chinese treasure ship - Wikipedia

3) Till today, all Chinese inventions are jokes.
Chinese microchip
The chip was later revealed to be a duplicate of a chip developed in the West, with the original identifications sanded away.
Hanxin - Wikipedia

got my (You)

That one graph is just change in gdp per year, ofc a developing nation will have a higher percentage than an already developed nation, how dumb are you people?

The graph is called percentage of All PERSONS mentioned and I cant find the roster of individual events.

Then why is Israel ranked so low in actual IQ testing?

Attached: iq_and_the_wealth_of_nations (1).jpg (734x828, 215K)

>The so called 4 great inventions that make/break modern world.

Attached: fuck-outta-here-b-teamnoharmdone-noharmdone-9300542.png (500x566, 143K)