>According to the Paiutes, the Si-Te-Cah were a red-haired band of cannibalistic giants >The Si-Te-Cah and the Paiutes were at war, and after a long struggle a coalition of tribes trapped the remaining Si-Te-Cah in Lovelock Cave. When they refused to come out, the Indians piled brush before the cave mouth and set it aflame. The Si-Te-Cah were annihilated. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Si-Te-Cah
Soros and Clinton funded soy bombs made them extinct
Elijah Anderson
Maybe they weren't very smart. Or they had issues with infant mortality/reproduction and were thus vastly outnumbered by regular homosapiens. Maybe it was a mutation that had made them huge and violent and they ended up getting killed off for being assholes before the genes spread any farther.
Giantesses are so cute I hate when faggots use them for city wide smut porn though
Parker Hill
The Si-Te-Cah were probably Vikings honestly. They made it to the Americas so it's not a stretch. >red-haired giants
Brandon Davis
Easier to hit, bigger target. Also giant people have a lot of medical problems, because it's usually from hormonal or genetic conditions, and just being bigger will put more strain on stuff like your back and joints. Add to that you need to eat so much more, in a time when food was regularly scarce.
Being a giant would just be no fun.
Thomas Cooper
Vikings went to a place thousands of kilometres from where this legend comes from, so yeah it's a bit of a stretch.
Wyatt Robinson
THAT WE KNOW OF, and these Vikings, if they were such, would have been exterminated and unable to share their tale.
Ayden Murphy
Yeah bro, I'm sure the vikings traveled all the way to western Nevada. That makes perfect sense.
Carson Gomez
They say Charliemang and Maximinus Thrax were 8 feet tall
Christian Foster
From the Wiki article: >During the 1924 excavation of the cave, a series of three human bones were found near the surface towards the mouth of the cave. "These had been split to extract the marrow, as animal bones were split, and probably indicate cannibalism during a famine."
...aaand you know what else can cause red hair? Malnutrition.
Wyatt Sanchez
Oh SHIT They weren't giants, they were wendigos
Evan Richardson
>At least it's not as goofy as Ancient Aliens guys
Ethan Watson
If by 'wendigos' you mean 'indigos' And by 'indigos' you mean 'indios' And by 'indios' you mean 'indians' Then yes, they were wendigos.
A realistic giant would indeed need a thicker spine, and stronger legs. Along with a few other changes that would make them a distinct species to humans.
Connor Watson
Same reason a swarm of killer bees can murder a human being. A big enough group is able to defeat individual giants. In a certain legend, giants were lured into some cave where humans burned and smoked them to death.
Angel Morales
But is there any reason the giants would be less numerous than the humans? Are they less capable of reproducing somehow? Are they more limited by food supply?
>is there any reason bears would be less numerous than a dogs? user. Think a little. They a bigger so they need more nutrition and probably their pregnancy period is longer(the same goes probably for puberty time), multiple pregnancy(as like multiple offspring from one pregnancy) is also probably much rarer. Less population, longer growth period before fertile, need for more nutrition. Also giants were probably remnants of humans from previous ages where Earth environments were different(more oxygen, less gravity, different electromagnetic field). Neoteny and all of it.
That board is only helpful in summoning succubi. Why do you even ponder such pesky questions when the very existence of giants is shrouded in mystery and secrecy? You cannot seriously expect to receive answers to such difficult questions, anime-poster.
David Roberts
their poor mother. good lord
Kayden Morales
>less gravity
Ok, just came in here to say that. Carry on with your nonsense.
