Why is there such a hard-on for Rhodesia on here? Rhodesia was a brutal white Colonial is dictatorship that was oppressive to the native population of Zimbabwe. They were one of the very few white Nations that were resisting decolonization in Africa when they should have just shared power with a black political party and help transition from a colony into an independent nation. Rhodesia was a fascist dictatorship that was no different then the Jim Crow laws of the South nor the Confederacy or white European colonialism. So why the apologism for white supremacy for Rhodesia?
Why is there such a hard-on for Rhodesia on here...
Josiah Brooks
Other urls found in this thread:
metmuseum.org
whc.unesco.org
amp.livescience.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.m.wikipedia.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
en.wikipedia.org
whc.unesco.org
en.wikipedia.org
google.com
en.wikipedia.org
abcnews.go.com
twitter.com
William Ward
the same reason people love Poland despite it being a shithole full of cunts
Jeremiah Butler
>Eheheh BASED nigger-killers
Adam Myers
Because of how terrible managed Zimbabwe was, it is a big 'I told you so' to anyone who hates Africans.
To them, all those things that you listed are good things.
Also, I would make the argument that those three things were quite different.
Landon Davis
This is Veeky Forums, what do you expect?
Ryan Perry
Ah to have the mind of a retard, you must feel so free and confident.
Aiden Anderson
Because of the /pol/lution
Asher Brown
Because fuck communism and fuck home rule. It's pretty fucking clear they weren't ready for it.
Liam Sanders
Sure, their voting system was unevenly distributed towards whites, but Rhodesia was a cupcake with a cherry on top compared to Mugabe.
Take a white farmer afraid of losing their way of life and denying black people on the other side of the country the right to vote for some communist warlord. You might disagree, but they are hardly evil.
Juan Roberts
>Rhodesia was a fascist dictatorship
Factually incorrect, please check your claims before you post them.