>tfw this was the last time in human history for epic naval battles
>tfw it wasn't even that impressive, just americans roflstomping outdated japanese navy and air force
WW2 Pacific Theater
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
m.youtube.com
myredditvideos.com
twitter.com
>tibet
>neutral
who cares
>tibet
>a legitimate independent country
Tibet joining the war would have made Japan win, prove me wrong
>the last time in human history for epic naval battles
I'd watch the South China Sea for the next 20 years or so. Or the Arctic for that matter. Don't worry user, wildly epic naval battles between clashing empires is not a thing of the past.
>The Can-Berr-A
Is Canberra really that hard to pronounce?
quints have spoken
I’m Australian, and everyone I know (including myself) just pronounced it like Cann-Bruh.
Not even a Japanese victory in the Pacific would save one of the dullest regimes in the history of totalitarian states. Seriously, each history chapter surrounding the failed painter and his pals from the National Socialist German Workers' Party as they fight what they call the „international Jewry“ has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the monumental imagery, the regimes‘ only consistency has been it’s lack of excitement and ineffective use of it’s military, all to make anti-semitism seem tactically Jewish, to make it’s misinterpreted Nietzschean inspiration seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Hitler ordered the Night of the Long Knives: he made sure his regime would never be taken seriously by anyone besides the world’s most ignorant, moronic extremists. Just a ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for his book.
The Third Reich might have been anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly anti-adventurous in it’s refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least their military was good though
„No!“ The Wehrmacht was dreadful, their campaigns ultimately a disaster. As I studied, I noticed that everytime they went to war, the Germans conducted one or another atrocity. I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that the Wehrmacht conducted an atrocity or conducted some form of „Jewish“ act, such as false-flag attacks. I stopped only after I marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. The mind of a National Socialist is so governed by autistic fantasies of romantism that they have no other way of acting. Later I read a lavish, Holocaust-denying paper on Adolf Hitler by David Irving. He wrote something to the effect of, „If these kids are reading /pol/, they will go on to read David Irving.“ And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read /pol/, you are, in fact, trained to read David Irving.
Michael Bay pls leave
Nice
nice, now we just have to warn duterte shit will hit the fan
Isnt he sucking up to the chinese tho
hes sucking up to what he feels like
>>„No!“ The Wehrmacht was dreadful, their campaigns ultimately a disaster.
They literaly fought the entire fucking world for 6 years, and came close to winning you Lefty-Pol roach.
And yet the nips rekt the US/brit Navy in guadalcanal.
hmm, that sounds familiar
>came close to winning
kek
Oh yeah, they sure rekt them. Like 1-2 times. Just a shame they lost the next 3-4 battles and you know...Guadalcanal
Ofc they did, you brainlet.
>Dunkirk
>Barbarossa
>Stalingrad
All those battles were only lost because of Hitlers stupidity.
>if it wasnt for x, Germany would have won
Germany was the most powerful nation militarily, and econimically. Slavshits and Anglo-roaches cannot compete. Prove me wrong, faggot.
read a fucking book
>most powerful nation militarily and economically*
>consistently out-produced by the individual Allied nations in most fields of war production
two words
>United States
Except: 1 Tiger tank = 10 shitty Ronsons
So Germany still won the industrial contest.
how many brit ships were sunk at Guadalcanal again?
>so Germany won the industrial contest
>consistently out-produced by the individual Allied nations in most fields of war production
Try again, wehraboo poofter.
>Prove me wrong, faggot.
Win the war then, faggot
If you want to have an adult discussion, please try to use big-boy words and not memes.
Germany was the BEST fighting force in the war, and only lost because it fought against the entire world you faggot.
>BEST fighting force in the war
Oh wow. Conquered half of Poland, half of France, Denmark, Norway and some Balkan backwaters before having your shit pushed in by real armies. Very impressive fighting force indeed.
>fought against the entire world
And whose fault is that?
>best fighting force
An unsustainable one.
B-b-b-b-but they were outnumbered by the USSR!!! Remember the wave after wave of 12-year-old kids with 3 rifles between them? That happened!
Germany practically anihilated Russia in 1941, final victory was only squandered because of Hitler.
>BEST fighting force in the war
OH NO NO NO NO NO NO
Er, do you even know who won that battle?
>exhausts their entire manpower reserves in a few months
>fail to take Moscow
>get stuck in a war of attrition when the entire point of Barbarossa was precisely to avoid this
>Dunkirk
Winning at Dunkirk would not have defeated Britain. Indeed, thtey technically won at Dunkirk, youll recall.
>Barbarossa
This would only have worked if they had done what Hitler wa ted and used their whole force to strike for the Caucasus and seize the oil. It was a long shot but the only shot.
>Stalingrad
This would never have suceeded, it was too late.
Except Germany only lost 300 thousand men in 4 months of barbarossa while Slavshits lost over 4 million.
Except they didnt kill Shermans at a 10:1 ratio, and they only had 1400 tigers. Brilliant logistical planning there.
Tigers oblitherated Ronsons from 5km you brainlet, shitty Anglo optics could not even spot a see a target from that far.
And yet you still lost lmao
>muh K/D ratio
This isn’t CoD kiddo, those 300,000 troops was literally ALL of the trained troops the Wehrmacht had in reserve, and the Germans had to scramble to replace their losses by conscripting huge swathes of the population. The Soviet Union had manpower to spare. Also the 300,000 figure only includes Germany, with the other Axis forces included the number is closer to a million.
Wehrmacht had 18 million people under its command you brainlet, they had plenty of manpower. Germans oblitherated 15 million Ruskie troops, while losing only 3.5 million.
>5km
Go back to /pol/
>Wehrmacht had 18 million people under its command you brainlet
Not in 1941, they basically had to rebuild their entire manpower pools after Barbarossa.
>Germans oblitherated 15 million Ruskie civilians