SS

Is it any better that he’s telling skinny kids to gain 40lbs of weight when 35 of those pounds will be fat? No, it’s a stupid idea, it’s unhealthy, and you’re going to end up losing mass if you ever decide to end up cutting. Because it means that you’ll have to cut for a far longer period of time. Unless you never cut, like Rippetoe wants

No. But degenerate whore from Germany who has chugged a literal beer pitcher of fresh sperm.

Instead of properly doing what you were told you thought about it real hard and apparently forgot you are a brainlet. Building muscle raises your TDEE (the calories needed to maintain that muscle) which is one of a few reasons cutting us easier the more muscle you have.
>if you are so stupid that you need a program, at least be smart enough to do the entire thing to the best of your ability

This has to be a troll

same shit happens
people get fucked for having unpopular stands on how they interpret data.

lol at the newfags falling for this bait
no one could be as dumb as OP

There have been numerous archealogical and anthropological digs where they are reporting dates that are completely at odds with what numerous/mulitple geologists are finding for the strata they are found in. And it's not "a little"; it's tens of thousands of years.

There was a dig in Mexico decades ago where all the geological tests (and there were many and many different kinds) were showing human artifacts ranging from 25K to over 50K years old. Of course, this flies completely in the face of what archaeologists and anthropologists "accept" as the possible dates for human habitation in that part of the world. So, the archaelogist who ran that dig was uniformly drummed out and made an example of. They destroyed her career and have continued to show her as an example of how to be wrong (despite overwhelming amd proven evidence that she was right).

Moreover, the Mexican governmemt halted all future digs at the site (at the behest of anthropological and archealogical bigwigs at universities there and abroad) and went so far as to sell the land and let it be developed. All so two academic "disciplines" didn't have to face the music that their models and theories are not just wrong but absurbedly wrong.

There's quite of few examples out there and a really good book on the subject called "Forbidden Archealogy" or something. That book is actually based on the "peer reviewed" papers that never see the light of day because they conflict with prevailing theories and supported ideas.

I know all of this is completely offtopic for Veeky Forums and I apologize for that. I do find the topic fascinating though and couldn't keep ky miuth shut.