Can we all just agree that having a six pack is 100% reliant on genetics. I do zero core exercises, am in the process of a bulk, and have pic related abs. I find the emphasis on “six pack abs” as part of aesthetics is unfair to people whose frame and build can’t support one.
Can we all just agree that having a six pack is 100% reliant on genetics. I do zero core exercises...
>is unfair to people
And I think it's unfair, that a soyboy like you are, cries about hurting random people on the anonymous internet.
Your abs also look like shite btw
>Literally no definition
Wyd dude
Sounds like bullshit. Everyone has ab muscles and I don't see why everyone can't get them to show with direct training and low enough bodyfat.
you're dumb
holy shit
you're bulking because you wanted to bulk for some legitimate reason
people who want abs generally do not need to bulk for any reason
Auschwitz mode aside, of course
>already stated zero core work
>”you have weak abs”
Yeah no shit, but the foundation is there and I know people who do core every other day with no results. I’m not shitting on people for having naturally having a physique that makes abs difficult/impossible, I’m saying that the focus people have on abs is unnecessary given that it doesn’t work for everybody.
Auschwitz mode is from thyroid disease, feels bad. That’s my general point in this thread, you can’t change your physique so you should stop working towards something you’ll never have and work with what you’ve got
Where you hold your fat is reliant on genetics
It's 99% bodyfat % and 1% fat distribution. So I'll give you 1% genetics. Literally anyone will have a visible abs at low enough bf%, not necesarily six pack since 4/6/8-pack is genetics. It will just be harder if you have fucked body fat distribution..
With low enough body fat everybody can have visible abs.
The only faggots who expect people who lift to have abs 24/7 are normies who don't lift.