Partly right on the first one, but hilariously wrong on the rest.
>Why do people seem to forget this: america owns china.
No. The US and China are financially co-dependent. But so were the UK and Germany in 1913.
>Economically we're one of the sole providers. We cut the tap they starve.
No, again. The US accounts for ~22% of the world economy, less by PPP.
>This lets us sell them shit they don't want to sell for less than its worth again that way we have >money to stay ontop of the debt and they have money to live.
That's partly right. The Chinese are producing some products very efficiently and some very inefficiently (at a lose). And their debt is skyrocketing faster than anyone else's.
>This is why any realistic future war scenario where china comes out ahead of america or even aims their guns at america is pure trash as they simply can't survive without us.
No. They would get hurt, but they could survive, and if they conquered most of East Asia in the process they could thrive in the future.
>Those manufacturing bases that are 20% larger? We supply them with 80-95% of their raw materials then buyback the cheaper made products than if we did it at home.
Completely wrong. Please consult these tables:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_largest_trading_partners_of_China
The US is certainly a large market for the Chinese, but so is the EU. And so is the rest of the world. And if the Chinese capture East Asia, they have the world's largest captive market. It would put the Imperial Preference system of the British Empire to shame.
>We put the banks there cause they have far less restrictive laws for capital and therefore far less loss.
Pardon? Those are Chinese banks. Foreigners have no control over them. They are controlled by the State Council. And they have far MORE restrictions over capital over there.
>and so long as the european bloc stands neither will any of them.
Sounds like pure bluster.