Players may only specify alternate hair or eye colours for human characters

>Players may only specify alternate hair or eye colours for human characters

Is this a fair decree?

Given that dwarves and halflings are like little humans, I would contest this.

More importantly, what of skin color?

Alternate as in?

And it depends on the setting, if any.

>Is this a fair decree?
Why would you even consider considering this?
It's an arbitrary limitation to character creation and serves no purpose to your game.

>arbitrary limitation

All limitations are arbitrary. This is not a bad thing. Limits make a game what it is. Every defined aspect of a game is a limit.

>serves no purpose to your game
It would serve to make humans a little more interesting for one.

If a character wants to be interesting physically, they'll specify those alternate colors themselves. I see where you're trying to come from, it's just that it seems like an awkward attempt to make humans interesting, when in fact it just makes them seem kind of special snowflake-y

So odd eye colours are how we make an interesting character? I can see where this is heading.

Imagine yourself.
Now imagine yourself with blue hair and neon green eyes.
You're just as uninteresting in both scenarios.

If your character isn't interesting without unique hair and eyes then he/she certainly won't be interesting with them.

That said grey eyes best eyes. Red hair best hair. Fight me.

Are you saying humans should not be allowed to have blue/green/grey/etc eyes?