Why is 2E art so superior to other editions' art?

Why is 2E art so superior to other editions' art?

Other urls found in this thread:

girlgeniusonline.com/comic.php?date=20021104#.WEJyf7IrIkI
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

That left arm is so uncomfortable to look at

Better budget than previous editions.

Digital art allows for a lot of shortcuts (cloning, etc.) that let mediocre artists compete with people who have a deeper technical knowledge, but it's cheaper to hire a 20-something with a tablet than to hire someone who paints by hand.

Good covers. That's about it.

I like the acid quality of b/x otus art

No WoW
No anime (at least, not so popular among gamers)
No Wayne Reynolds

/thread

The eighties were a special time.

Hijacking slightly, but what are the advantages of 2e and its later Advanced (I think) books over 3.5 and 5? I've been looking for something different lately, and the art is fucking badass and wonderfully strange and makes me think of Conan for some reason.

More brown. Brown is good.

...

There are no real advantages.

That's jab right?

Dayyum Young'uns & Dragons

>Hijacking slightly, but what are the advantages of 2e [...] over 3.5 and 5?
They are fundamentally very, very different systems. Frankly it's hard to even compare them.
All the TSR versions of D&D are further to the side of rules-lite, and they don't* suffer from caster supremacy.
You have to put up with every aspect of playing using a separate resolution mechanic though.

Attacks are roll over, and subtract opponents AC from your target number.
Attribute checks and Saves are roll under, with things modifying your target number.
NWP (skill) checks are roll high, but under. Some things modify the target number, IIRC some things modify the roll?
Most racial abilities are "get specific values on a d6".
The list goes on and on.

>and its later Advanced (I think) books
The "original" D&D line was just D&D.
The revised edition was Advanced D&D (names changed to try and avoid the religious stigma at the time).

AD&D and AD&D 2e are nearly identical. 2e was written after a hostile takeover of TSR. It was only made to screw Gygax out of royalties.
Gygax wrote 1st edition, some guy worse at explaining things but who could organize material if his life depended on it wrote 2nd edition.
Make of that what you will, they're both pretty good. Also near identical.

Basic D&D separate product line, closer to original D&D.
It was developed simultaneously with AD&D til the end of TSR, but AD&D predates Basic.

I can't count the time I spent in middle/high school trying to figure out and justify that arm.

He just smashed the door open by swinging his elbow.
His arm is going through a combination of whiplash and follow-through.
His torso is angled oddly so that he can immediately strike with his ax.
Might have been enemies behind the door, he was being prepared.

He's half-rakshasa, the one hand is upside down.

He broke through the door using a shield-bashing motion but with his bare arm.

It's just a curved arm with the wrist twisted to show the back of his hand. Just did the pose myself and it's not even that uncomfortable.

>and it's not even that uncomfortable
You sure you did it right? It puts extreme strain on your carpals.

>No Wayne Reynolds
This. Modern fantasy art is just fine actually. Wayne Reynolds is a singular blight upon fantasy art.

No muddy art. The colors and shapes are muddy in later editions.

That guy sure does like boobs.

Boob window in a breastplate is priceless.

>a singular blight upon fantasy art
Only because Foglios can't be a singular blight when there's two of them.

What's wrong with his chest? Is he okay?

>All the TSR versions of D&D are further to the side of rules-lite, and they don't* suffer from caster supremacy.
>2e is rules lite
>5e suffers from caster supremacy

Didn't they used to draw porn?

2e is rules-lite and every 5e class is a caster

Short answer: yes.
Long answer: you don't wanna know.

*except run-of-the-mill sword and board fighter
they aren't even a partial caster

...

The cleric was having a rough day, ok? Be glad it's even reattached in the first place, Grognar!

Nah. It's not fine. Reynolds is kind of extreme example, an impersonation of the current trends. turned up to eleven, but it doesn't mean everything else around is fine.
I'll agree that a lot of modern art is good and even amazing and that the quality decrease has very little, if anything to do with dichotomy of traditional and digital formats. But this good art is not only minority in volume, but also mostly kept out from mainstream use (like being used as illustrations to popular systems, concept art for vidya etc.). Good art, you usually can find only in more niche games, or as independent work.

>No WoW (more like "MMORPGs",but ok)
>No anime (mostly THIS)

>No Wayne Reynolds
How is this still a meme?

This

Wait, they stopped?

Damn...
Almonds activated

He's a berserker who's so pumped-up that his body is distorting.

Checkin

fite me faget

It'd be fine if either the heel of the hand was turned towards the viewer or the elbow was more prominent, casting a shadow over the forearm. It's the two combined that make it such an awkward pose.

These mistakes happen all the time, if you're not working from a model or their pose shifts over time, but they're very noticeable (or more accurately, very awkward looking when finally noticed) when they deal with hands or prominent joints because we're very aware of what the human body is supposed to look like.

not him but I wanna know

80s metal

XXXenophile
There's comics series and there's derived card game. Proceed at you own risk.

>Foglio cited rape,
>mind control,
>pedophilia,
>"classical necrophilia",
>excretion,
>snuff porn,
>branding,
>piercing,
>heavy sadomasochism,
>and spanking

>as topics that he did not find appealing and would not write about.

>no Mexican Sugar Dancing

pffft. Vanilla

I don't know who he is, how's he fucking everything up?

>I don't know who he is
Comic book artist with no sense of anatomy.
He does all the Pathfinder art.

>how's he fucking everything up?
Setting bad precedent.

This is my head canon now.

>All the pathfinder art
Just the book covers and iconic characters, actually.

He also does a lot of the 3e and 4e and 5e art, and quite a few magic cards.

He's my favorite artist. I like his "style over anatomy" approach for fantasy games

>AD&D predates Basic.
That's not right.

> AD&D predates Basic.
Blue Box was July, Monster Manual was December.

>all these people shitting on wayne
not only is his art fantastic but his semi canon statments on the pathfinder iconics he has drawn are the only things that make them remotely bearable

There was a beautiful simplicity and realism to the old art. Today's art is just way too over the top.

Because it's hard to top diTerlizzi and he did a lot of shit for 2e

So that's the name of the man who's MtG art I hate. Glad to know.

Goes hand in hand with the tone of each edition really.

Go binge his webcomic.

>girlgeniusonline.com/comic.php?date=20021104#.WEJyf7IrIkI

>The revised edition was Advanced D&D (names changed to try and avoid the religious stigma at the time).
AD&D was created as a separate line with a distinct name to screw Arneson out of royalties.

>It was developed simultaneously with AD&D til the end of TSR, but AD&D predates Basic.
Holmes Basic was released shortly before the 1st AD&D book (the Monster Manual), and well before all of the core books were released. Granted, it only went up to level 3 and was as much of an OD&D starter set as it was a true Basic edition, but it still counts.

>"classical necrophilia"
Postmodern necrophilia is where it's at.

I dunno. GG is cartoony enough that it can get away with wacky anatomy.

I mean, it's a setting where certain people are genetically predisposed to being minions for mad scientists. If anything his style works with the setting.

/ic/ here.
Your post triggered me

Quantity over quality produces more quality.

THAC0 means that retards who can't do simple arithmetic won't join your game.