ITT: Lawful Good characters only

ITT: Lawful Good characters only

I would have serious problems in defining Caim's alignment. Neutral? He's focused on a single thing, killing for revenge and for the pleasure of killing.

In stock D&D, that would make him Chaotic Evil. Lucky me no DM will ever get me in an insane Drakengard-style setting.

...

...

...

Caim is difficult but I think a large part of the point of his character is that he is not a good person. He's a bloodlusting asshole who just happened to be pointed at a clearly morally corrupt empire.

I'd probably call Caim Neutral Evil.

...

How can somebody with such an innocent smile be evil?

Well, the G-E axis is pretty easy. He's killing people because he's a hate-driven murderer. D&D morality is quite clear that doing the right thing for the wrong reason is Evil.
The L-C axis is a bit of a bitch, yeah. I'd personally peg him as NE, but there's argument to be made for LE and CE. Mainly because the L-C axis is so poorly defined.

The game outright says and illustrates that Caim walks hand in hand with good and evil. He's True Neutral.

If mercy was just it would be redundant and serve no purpose. If mercy were not just it would be nepotism, spite and hatred.

...

Is Zero lawful good? I mean everyone else is either a flower puppet or the Drakengard standard (douchebag/asshole).

Zero is CE transitioning to CN. She'd never really make the jump from CN to CG, she's got absolutely no altruism in her.
Most everybody else is some flavor of E.
Mikhail not excepted.

You're right I'd forgotten about her backstory where she murdered people who had stuff she needed.

That said, once the flower shit kicks off I would drop the Chaotic because she basically sets out on a personal mission to fuck its shit up and sticks to it.

Gabriela is also not Evil, I think.

>lucky

Gabriella, Michael, and Mikhail all have the same moral issue of "going along with and helping do badwrong things".
Michael may or may not have an excuse, depending on if he realized exactly what the Flower was and what it meant, and his motives.

I'd argue that Zero is far too erratic and "fuck planning" to qualify as L. Then again, the L-C axis is so poorly defined that there's a dozen ways to argue what L and C mean.

Ok now I'm actually wondering if One was intentionally referencing that.

I would say Zero is NE at first with some more true neutral tendencies. She was always looking out for herself until she got FLOWER'd and after that, she wanted to rid the world of the flower.

Also the true end to drakengard 3 is stupid

I want to rape mikhail

Caim's alignment is Lawful Murder at best.
Or maybe Murder Neutral.
Or Murder Murder.

Caim's universe was so shitty, I can almost believe that his murderous self was an instrument of Lawful Good.

Can't stop the german pain train.

...

Zero dies one way or another, there's worse ways to go than suicide by dragon baby.

...