It's not a breakpoint, though. It's an extremely specific combination of things done that all require multiple layers of approval from a GM, and which often have heavily conflicting fluff belonging to them.
It's a pile of mechanics that literally will not interact with eachother under any foreseeable circumstances
The flaw of this argument starts with
>you and your friends are sitting around the table playing MtG
You are not playing the game, you are discussing it, he's not barging his way into your house or online group or whatever, he's on an imageboard. He has interrupted nothing, he isn't even intruding, he has as much right to voice his opinions as you do
Man you made a bad anaology
1. Perfectly optimized decks? Legacy players would be excited to see their format improved.
2. If somethings on the banlist it would be comparable to him making arguments using shit like sacred geometry, he does not.
3. MTG at a high level is played between perfectly or nearly perfectly optimized decks. 'netdecking' is literally a thing and what happens to all serious tournaments.
4. RAW is literally what MTG is run by.
Additionally, 2hu does not insist you reply, if a post is ignored, it will get ignored. He is also not 'yelling', he's posting the same way anybody else can.
He's the scenario in reality
>Person shows up
>speaks about an optimized broken combo
>leaves
>meanwhile 3 hours later faggots are still bitching about that guy and they have become far more annoying than the guy at this point.
Swashbucklers are bad. This isn't an argument we need to make again. Just because somebody can contribute to a campaign with skill monkeying or roleplaying doesn't make the class any less mechanically bad at the core of the game, which is combat. This is 3.pf, its at its core a combat game.
Its literally FREE QA.
>You are talking with your friends
>A man walks up and begins talking about something technically related to the topic, but yells loud enough to drown others out
>They do this while wearing a garish outfit and pissing in people's faces
>You believe that everyone should just carry on like nothing is happening and that this is entirely acceptable
You don't get out much, do you? And you're still ignoring what the core of the problem is.
We don't like him because he's an ass. Not because he's wrong.
2hu also shows broken points within systems solely using that system, he's done it many times. Its FREE QA. Literally pure benefits for writers.
He rarely mixes subsystems to show something.
>Heavily conflicting fluff
Fluff is fluff, as long as it makes sense with the mechanics, what's actually written is unimportant
And if it obeys RaW, and is broken, then the problem is not with him, it is with the RaW. You're doing what the shitty PF devs do, asking people to just ignore poor writing decisions because it's inconvenient for you to face them
Jesus fucking christ people stop replying to him.
>a long post on an imageboard.
>comparable to yelling
>He's an ass
>because he's LITERALLY AUTISTIC
>ON Veeky Forums.ORG of all places!
Well i'm shocked to say the least.
I like how 2hu witch-hunter and DHB witch-hunter have both proved themselves utterly retarded today.