>you'd notice they have been gaining market while losing value. Not going to spoon feed you on what this means.
many of the retards here think they are smart and they can't see it, the normies they hate can see it, and that's why they are running to Ripple.
*businesses
of course they would
>of course they would
Potential timescale?
isnt this just not mineable, centralized, 100 billion supply shitcoin with the hidden agenda as a tool for the kikes of ws to steal btc?
good luck buying a house with bitcoin
they will probably bundle it with other changes in the next release (don't know when).
There's a constant in the code defining the maximum number of tokens as 100 billion.
The amendment process for adding code patches requires that 80%+ of the network validators vote to include any given patch. If they wanted to increase the supply, they'd have to convince everyone running the validators (banks/FIs/corps/universities) to vote for it.
One of the main selling points of XRP is the limited supply.
You're probably just interested in spreading FUD, so I don't expect to convince you. Either way, there are the facts.
They've commented on this. The minimum will very likely be amended in the future as the price goes up. I imagine once it crosses a certain value threshold and stabilizes. Not difficult to fix, but you might have to hang on to those for a while... not that you shouldn't be holding anyway...
/pol/tard detected.
1- XRP's price would collapse immediately
2- Their main source of revenue would be gone.
3- Their reputation, the most important thing you need in this business, would be irrevocably destroyed. No one, not users nor banks would trust you them again
4- they would be sued into oblivion by the institutional buyers who bought directly from them under the fixed supply assumption
ripple.com
5- they would need to convince ALL exchange and validators which are very reputable(like MIT, Microsoft, ..etc) to go along with the scam.