Weekend Warcraft Lore General

Both these perspectives are asinine and rooted in a fundamental misunderstanding of both Goblins and Priests.
You think that all goblins have to be the same stereotype. But they don't. And you think priests are DnD clerics. But they're not.
Warriors, Hunters and Priests form the trifecta of melee-ranged-support reminiscent from Warcraft: Orcs and Humans. EVERYONE should be permitted to be any of these without exception, and the fluff be adjusted to allow for it. Every single race including goblins and gnomes needs to have a belief system the priest class is a part of, just as they have basic military castes for Warriors and specialised military groups for Hunters. It's one of the first things you'd ask when designing a race - what do they believe in?

And Goblins do not ONLY believe in gold, you dumb antisemetic shits.

The only thing I thought when I saw Sylvanas in TFT is "When are we getting back to Arthas?"
TFT is an unfocused clusterfuck. Only Rexxar's campaign has a consistent protagonist, and only Arthas' campaign has a likeable protagonist. Maiev would have been one too, if her campaign wasn't literally shanghaied by Malfurion and Illidan at the end.

>he didn't figure it out
yikes

>How many of you thought "MILKIES!"

Me.

>Ren'dorei.
>Not naming them Squi'dorei
You had one job, Blizzard.

I didn't expect it, but I don't mind it. My Warfu can slaughter as many innocent children as she wants as long as she keeps looking cute and angry.

Think it's dumb how the game made you go from fighting a lvl 10 Paladin to a lvl 4-7 PotM knockoff who can't even cast an ult.

Void was also described to come into existence when Light in those areas "burned out". Quite like Naaru life cycle.

Sylvanas campaign felt good because I got to murder Garithos.

Garithos and his lackeys were a hackneyed attempt to make Warcraft humans look bad in a game where Arthas and the Cult of the Damned already existed.