>character is a female
>character is a female paladin
>character is of noble blood
>character is chaste for religious reasons
>character wears covering clothes for religious reasons
>character refuses anyone but her sworn squire to see her without the covering clothes
>sworn squire is a boy in his early teens
>character wears full chastity gear under her clothes and armor
Where do you draw the line?
When does subtle magical realm become over magical realm?
I guess at the last one. Remember to fap before posting.
>character is a female
yeah why not
>character is a female paladin
nope
Not OP, but what's so sexual about chastity gear? It's not like that wasn't historically a thing or anything.
Everything is someone's fetish. /d/ sometimes has dedicated female chastity threads
I was with you until you went full pedo.
Get the fuck off Veeky Forums.
>character refuses anyone but her sworn squire to see her without the covering clothes
Here. Before this, she is pretty much just a fighting nun, nothing all that weird. Add the squire who's allowed to see her naked and suddenly we are onto behind closed doors shenanigans where the "chaste" battle nun is doinking the squire, still not quite full magical realm but getting there. Then we get to underage sex then chastity fetish which is also getting into rapey territory.
Chastity gear wasn't real, it was a made up metaphorical thing used in satirical works basically to make fun of literal cucks.
>behold my ancient copypasta
>Veeky Forums sure is creative still!
>Chastity gear wasn't real, it was a made up metaphorical thing used in satirical works basically to make fun of literal cucks.
P R O O F S
R
O
O
F
S
You're a moron.