>character is a female
>character is a female paladin
>character is of noble blood
>character is chaste for religious reasons
>character wears covering clothes for religious reasons
>character refuses anyone but her sworn squire to see her without the covering clothes
>sworn squire is a boy in his early teens
>character wears full chastity gear under her clothes and armor
Where do you draw the line?
When does subtle magical realm become over magical realm?
I guess at the last one. Remember to fap before posting.
>character is a female
yeah why not
>character is a female paladin
nope
Not OP, but what's so sexual about chastity gear? It's not like that wasn't historically a thing or anything.
Everything is someone's fetish. /d/ sometimes has dedicated female chastity threads
I was with you until you went full pedo.
Get the fuck off Veeky Forums.
>character refuses anyone but her sworn squire to see her without the covering clothes
Here. Before this, she is pretty much just a fighting nun, nothing all that weird. Add the squire who's allowed to see her naked and suddenly we are onto behind closed doors shenanigans where the "chaste" battle nun is doinking the squire, still not quite full magical realm but getting there. Then we get to underage sex then chastity fetish which is also getting into rapey territory.
Chastity gear wasn't real, it was a made up metaphorical thing used in satirical works basically to make fun of literal cucks.
>behold my ancient copypasta
>Veeky Forums sure is creative still!
>Chastity gear wasn't real, it was a made up metaphorical thing used in satirical works basically to make fun of literal cucks.
P R O O F S
R
O
O
F
S
You're a moron.
It’s taken from Joan of Arc I think, her squire had to help her dress in her armor and saw her naked.
I'm not saying people didn't make them or they didn't exist but they were mostly a joke and later an exaggerated urban legend to scandalize and titillate in Victorian times.
atlasobscura.com
Literally 2pure for this world.
>>character refuses anyone but her sworn squire to see her without the covering clothes
or you know, the squire could chosen for the task because they are castrated
or it's a pair of squires that are gay for each other (and only the knight knows)
or the squires is just unfortunate bloke upon whom the knight takes heavy penance whenever they seem to do anything inappropriate (such as accidental touch) even though she "accidentally" caused it herself. Which she will do, a lot. Because seeing the boy take two dozen lashes makes her feel warm and fuzzy inside, in a way she can't quite explain, but if it feels this good it has to be righteous, right?
I mean, there's so many other way to take this into Magical Realm, you don't have to settle for the simple minded "oh, actually the fug"
>Where do you draw the line?
Right here.
>>sworn squire is a boy in his early teens
Although, generally, if you're putting your armour on, you don't have time to bang.
And generally, if you're taking your armour off you don't feel like banging because you're gross and need to bathe.
But user, that's the most normal one on the whole list. That's exactly what squires (or apprentices in general) usually were.
This should be Oglaf strip.
>before battle Lady Knight wants to bang, but Squire urges her on to do the armor because the enemy is already at the gates
>cue battle
>after battle squire tries to avoid the point because she's now all sweaty, gross and covered in gore
It just needs a punchline.
fuck off Anglo
>character is women who shows no skin and won't do anything sexual
What kind of magical realm is this? You'd have to be a paladin irl to get off on this anti-porn
cute fully clothed paladin ladies are the purest form of love interest
Why?
>Why are women who clearly exhibit pure traits pure?
Because when you finally get her to realize her feelings for you she will never leave you for anyone else. When she makes a commitment she will keep it.
I'd go as far as the penultimate, if you are not to creepy and if your players are innocent normies, you can play it up for laugh, though just to be safe I'd remove the boy being a teen squire and make him another young woman of low upringing
Paladins of Sune hate it.
>Teen
>Rape
Found the Americuck.
Yeah, let;s make new shit - how about talking about fetish games that were more fun then normal ones?
Historically boys would come of age around 14-16 years old, it's only pedo by modern standards, and only in certain places
That is some kinky shit user.
Because insecure man are afraid of a woman who owns her sexuality. If she is not deadly afraid of her own bodies and desires, they can't handle it for fear of not being able to please them and/or getting cucked.
>what's so sexual about chastity gear?
Specifically mentioning it as part of your character description is more than a little strange. In most games it would never be relevant.
The rest is standard stuff for an armored noble. Though truth be told I'm getting pretty fucking sick of the bog standard "female knight" shit. It's reached twin katana drow assassin levels for me.
Is that meant to be praise, complain, or just saying?
All I'm gonna say is that if some greentext going into further detail showed up, I wouldn't complain.
You call that flag waving?
I was referring to the squire raping the paladin.
>covering her hair for "purity"
Disgusting islamic tier tastes
>all sweaty, gross and covered in gore
H-ha you'd have to be crazy to be into that, right guys?
Actually....that is chatolic thing too....so don't feel above them, you are no better.
>maternal paladin taking care of her young sqire and teaching him to be virtuous
>squire is the only one allowed to see her naked, has to patch up paladin mom's wounds after every fight
Could be a very emotional and sweet story desu
Then they get raped by someone/thing else, lose to the dick, and are NTR'd away forever.
Meanwhile the impure who knows her body goes "So what, I came" and leaves NTR man to go back to her husbando.
The irony amuses me
If played right, I agree, especially if she was the sort to hide wounds for morale purposes and only the squire knew all her scars
>"Pure"
>Not committing a litany of war crimes on their rapist after the fact
vengeance is my fetish
as a DM I offer attack and damage bonuses to sworn enemies
>You're insecure if you don't want to marry a whore
No.
>Jesus married a literal prostitute
>You can't marry a girl that understands how her biology works
Sounds like insecurity to me.
>>Jesus married
that's some heretical talk
>Jesus married a literal prostitute
No he didn't
>You can't marry a girl that understands how her biology works
You can marry a whore, but shouldn't. Also, having sex does not teach anyone anything.
independent.co.uk
I'm willing to believe this because the church did a good job "losing" parts of the bible before
Yeah, but she had mental disorders, even for a young squire, fucking a retard could be not very appealing.
I'm pretty sure a society that has lady knights would have girl squires too, and putting them together would make sense. Let the girl learn the ways of the order as she serves under the itinerant battle nun.
BUTT, it could become Magical Realm if your imagination flows that way.
>44+0000
God damn it
Still, I'm pretty sure that is Meliadoul from the Glabados Church, the FFT version of Catholics, she is a nun with armor basicly.
But I can see why some people would feel confused.
>having sex doesn't teach anyone anything
Avoiding any rational discussion about how this is obviously false....
And he, Enkidu, whose origin is the mountain,
Who eats vegetation with gazelles,
Drinks at the watering place with cattle,
Satisfied his need for water with wild beasts.
Shamhat looked at the primitive man,
The murderous youth from the depths of open country.
"Here he is, Shamhat, bare your bosom,
Open your legs and let him take in your attractions!
Do not pull away, take wind of him!
He will see you and come close to you.
Spread open your garments, and let him lie upon you,
Do for him, the primitive man, as women do.
Then his cattle, who have grown up in open country with him,
will become alien to him.
His love-making he will lavish upon you!"
Shamhat loosened her undergarments, opened her legs and he took in her attractions.
She did not pull away. She took wind of him,
Spread open her garments, and he lay upon her.
She did for him, the primitive man, as women do.
His love-making he lavished upon her.
For six days and seven nights Enkidu was aroused and poured himself into Shamhat.
When he was sated with her charms,
He set his face towards the open country of his cattle.
The gazelles saw Enkidu and scattered,
The cattle of open country kept away from his body.
For Enkidu had stripped; his body was too clean.
His legs, which used to keep pace with his cattle, were at a standstill.
Enkidu had been diminished, he could not run as before.
Yet he had acquired judgment, had become wiser.
He turned back, he sat at the harlot's feet.
The harlot was looking at his expression,
And he listened attentively to what the harlot said.
The harlot spoke to him, to Enkidu....
if we're going full magical realm here
>it's an all male order
>their squires magically transform into full bodied dames when knighted
>cloistered knights train for years separated from society
>finally graduate knight apprenticeship
>get armor
>girdle of masculinity/femininity
>all the knights are female
how do?
>according to a manuscript almost 1,500 years old
So, almost 500 years after the gospels were written. What hogwash. Once again the eternal anglo tries to ruin everything good in the world.
Not only do you quote pagan texts, you post an example of a divinely created being being enlightened as part of a magic ritual, not a person actually learning anything from the physical act of fucking.
>2000 BC - we had this
>2000 AD - "show bobs and vagene"
The bible wasn't written anywhere near the time Jesus was alive.
In fact, most of it was put together in the centuries after his death. 1,500 is actually a pretty reasonable dating.
The gospels were written in the late first century.
>you post an example of a divinely created being being enlightened as part of a magic ritual, not a person actually learning anything from the physical act of fucking.
You realize effectively all of religious writing is some form of allegory or real-world application, yes? They're not meant to just be fairy tales. Why else would the Bible be filled with lessons and warnings?
>character wears full chastity gear under her clothes and armor
That's the one.
Chastity belts are fetish fuel. They were not real. Do you guys understand so little about basic anatomy and biology? If someone actually wore one of those, they'd be dead from sepsis within a month.
>people in the olden days didn't do stupid shit that would get them poisoned or killed from diseases
No really: they did not exist. It's a myth.
Then explain the meaning behind this scene.
You know, once upon a time I was thinking of making a Cleric who wore a veil at all times because that's my magical realm, but also because her deity rewards it as well (In mechanical way too, not some abstract) I was going to have her wear a chastity belt and a whole bunch of other fetishy stuff, but a lot of it'd interfere with actual adventuring but I'd mostly keep that detail to myself since it's obvious magical realm and that'd never reasonably come up.
Yea there was an article earlier in the thread. There's not any real evidence they were real. Modern belts exist and can be worn for multiple weeks, though periods still get in the way.
Because chastity wear shows the belief that there's a possibility of someone trying to bone your character, and the belief that you won't be ina position where your martial training and god given power will be unable to stop them from doing so
I'd like to say something to this but I've never seen someone play a female paladin without it being fetishy. The problem doesn't exist for fighters and clerics either.
>early teens
Still dangerously pedo even by then's standards.
>all knights are female
You mean, all of them are male that turned female upon graduation.
So if a girl by any chance graduates as a knight she will become a male knight, is that right?
If I have a dispel lotion and rub it on my genitals before putting the girdle of masculinity/femininity, will I turn the opposite sex while my genitals remain the same?
Asking for a friend.
I've seen a female player playing a paladin without fetish stuff. I think that is the only way to have a female paladin character with less chances of getting weird shit, and even that is not a sure thing, women that play RPG tend to have weird ideas but they usually use male characters for their magical realm stuff.
That is all fine in my eyes OP, just as long as you don't narrate said undressing around squire
Unless the group is fine with that, then go ahead
F A S T E R
I would, but I'm going to busy for like the next 24 hours
Nigel poster detected, 7 years war v.2 when!
>So if a girl by any chance graduates as a knight she will become a male knight, is that right?
Nah, park of the order and all that, full knights are female
>will I turn the opposite sex while my genitals remain the same?
Have you seen the things most ladyknights wear? That stuff's somehow skin tight, your armor will be VERY uncomfortable if you do
Though if you ask, enchanted strap ons are freely available, let's you feel everything
>>Meanwhile the impure who knows her body goes "So what, I came" and leaves NTR man to go back to her husbando.
>yeah I let my wife fuck strangers, but at the end of the day she's coming home to me, so who is the real winner here?
Are you fucking serious?
>>the independent
>hey guys cheddar man was black! Oh wait, he wasn't? Too bad were not gonna make a correction
>those girls who got gangraped in Rotherham were all sluts anyways and are racist for reporting the """asian""" men for their crimes
Would you allow any female PC?
>thinks catholic = all christians
user really?
Where is that bickcuck comic when you need it?
Fuck off Dan brown
>thinks catholic != all christians
You’re not a prot, are you?
Wait, so "settling for leftovers of a cock-carousel is manly" is a trend in USA now?
Fucking weirdos
People are trying to make it that.
Orthodox do that too.
It was an universal things back in the day, and wasn't tied to religion actually. People fancied good hair, thought it was sexy.
I think the same even today.
Gee I wonder who could be behind this
Russian hackers?
>when the elf gets caught AGAIN
No, it's just nature. When you are a male child, you do childish things like innocently look up skirts and grab thighs and pat and squeeze boobs, butts, and vaginas. When you come of age as a sexual teenager, you have sex as much as you can with who you like. As an adult, you choose someone to marry if you want.
This is a natural path for a male life, it means not everyone gets a ripe fruit fresh from the tree. Can't handle it? Complain or demean all you like, but you won't reproduce and the rest of us don't care.
Earlier Christian women practiced this pretty regularly. Orthodox women still do. Obviously, so do Catholic nuns.
The popularity of covering one's hair and the rules that govern it vary over time. The only time I've seen this used in fiction at all where it wasn't just fantasy durkas is Warhammer's Bretonnia, where noblewomen always cover their hair. It's specified if you were to catch one, say, bathing, she'd cover her hair before her body.
>Jesus married
Are you looking to get killed with the Saracen prisoners? Because that's how you get killed with the Saracen prisoners.
The only points that would annoy me:
>character wears full chastity gear under her clothes and armor
>character refuses anyone but her sworn squire to see her without the covering clothes
It doesn't have to come up. If you fear your DM might go sexual violence, note it down on your character sheet and IF it comes up, mention its existence. But as long as it is irrelevant, keep it to yourself.
A point I would like to point out:
>character is a female paladin
Either the character will be severely un-optimized, or will weight 250+ lb and won't be sexy anyway. Any attempt at erotic roleplay will become a running gag.
>realismfags
Not even true, either.
>Either the character will be severely un-optimized, or will weight 250+ lb and won't be sexy anyway.
>250+ lb of holy musclegirl
Jokes on you, that's my fetish and there's jack and shit you can do to keep me from envisioning her as a 20/10 amazon
>the female paladin has to be a fat landwhale to be effective in combat
there are a few of these gospels. But unfortunately, most were written decades later. often not by the people it claims. Oddly we know more about who wrote the old testament than this.
Honestly there approximately 2 that claim this. and much more that don't.
I want to add the bit the Prostitute was added much later so if this document says that she was. we can safely rule this out as a true Gnostic gospel.
There's also a manuscript claiming Jesus ministered in Japan, had a half-brother, and that he took Christ's place on the cross.
No. Adventuring is a man's business.