>Girl on Tinder says she likes books
>Message her saying I'm quite the literary aficionado, my favourite writers are Kafka, Wallace, Joyce, Proust and Nabokov and ask her about her favourites
>She says she loves John Green, The Hunger Games and Laurie Penny.
Why are women such plebs?
She replied back. You're in. Why the fuck are you complaining.
>inb4 it's bait
ITT: shit that never actually happened
If you actually called yourself a "literary aficionado" and listed all of your favourite authors in your first message, then there is no saving you however "pleb" or "patrician" the girl is.
>literary aficionado,
porn creeper
>my favourite writers are Kafka,
being alone
>Wallace,
treating women as objects
>Joyce,
brazillian fart porn yes pls
>Proust
secretly gay
>and Nabokov
need a wife to type my manuscript
If you can get her to type your story about how you were the best read man on tinder, you'll have more than just the DFW thing in common.
Roastie detected
Kek. She was being ironic, you dumbfuck. She was probably mocking your plebby and standard literary tastes.
the only one of those that's insulting to the writer is the Wallace one. mad /tv/ detected
This is bait. Report thread pls.
it's called fiction, newb
Women have less SAT scores on average.
>girl on Tinder says she likes "learning things"
>ask her what she likes learning
>she says "anything, I love smart men"
>start rambling off autistic factoids about random shit in my major
>she keeps replying with shit like "That is so interesting ! Noam Chomsky sounds like a fascinating man ! I must read some day !"
>occasionally talks about herself like she's a vampire
>end up meeting her and fucking her fat ass
>she gave me crabs
I doubt that.
What a depressing picture
...
>math
I'm a girl, I study philosophy, some of my favourites are Kierkegaard, Kafka, Dostoevskij. My brain doesn't depend on my vagina.
3/10 bad bait
>My brain doesn't depend on my vagina
It depends on Dostoyevsky not being in your top 10
I'm a guy. I like Locke and Confucius.
Then fuck the chick who believes the best women are property with hearts of gold, see how long before you're into Li Yu
Kek
'fraid not bruv,
is my girlfriend - who I've introduced to the magical world of Veeky Forums as of late - and some of her other favourites, afaik, are Cioran and Borges. We've spent the afternoon writing essays for our classes, she did a pretty cool thing about the Gadamerian critique of aesthetic "differentiation" (translating on the fly, don't know how you say it) in relation to street art and its inherent being-consumed.
Having a Top 10 is fairly ridiculous, friend.
>Then fuck the chick who believes the best women are property with hearts of gold
What the fuck are you even raving about
>this whole post
Listen here little baby. You're gonna get a lot of hurtful and degrading comments, but that ain't what I'm about. Let me just say, you are perfect the way you are. You hear me sugar? PERFECT. Don't ever change. You deserve anything and everything you want. Stay safe for me, baby girl.
>mfw thinking of you hurting
>Having a Top 10 is fairly ridiculous, friend.
but a sampling of three from the top is fine
>>Then fuck the chick who believes the best women are property with hearts of gold
>What the fuck are you even raving about
Dostoyevesky's whores. It's okay if you don't read your gf's books, I'm sure she doesn't know you don't read your books either.
>using anita sarsleezian reaction images
Based Anita is top waifu material, and as a plus she makes reactionary teenage virgins such as yourself mad as fuck
she's ugly and that's all that counts.
If I like a writer, it can be because I like his way of writing, his way of describing characters, most of his themes. It doesn't mean I appreciate all of his believes. I mentioned Kierkegaard, but I'm agnostic. Does it mean I can't take from his books the things I like and let them be part of my culture? If you think so, you're a fucking retarded.
>chews with her mouth open
Forgot
>Pic related, me and
>basement dwelling reactionary neckbeard gator NEETs calling anyone ugly
shouldnt that say "lower Sat scores". "less SAT scores" would only mean less women take the SAT
then it would be "fewer" you stupid faggot
you're both wrong and only i'm right
ITT: lets all troll each other
Nope, I was right the first time. How's high school?
what would be fewer? "fewer SAT scores". english is not my native language by the way but im pretty sure "lower" is the correct word there
I really don't understand why so many people on this website care about what girls listen to or read or watch or whatever.
You all sound like fags desu
I haven't had sex in a long time
"less SAT scores" is wrong tbqh
Oh look it's this thread again.
More women than men get English degrees
You're wrong bitch.
It's not. You should learn how English works.
>asement dwelling reactionary neckbeard gator NEETs calling anyone ugly
even if that were the truth, could an ugly person not call somebody else ugly?
This supports the stupidity of women.