What is some good anti-feminist literature?

The Koran

>The Quran
>misogynist

I want Eurocentric Islamaphobes to leave

0:^)}

They may be Islamaphobes, but they aren't wrong. Few religions aren't misogynist, most especially the Abrahamic. At any rate Islam doesn't promote any form of feminism, so troll/10

>anti-feminist means you hate women
Nice try, feminist scum.

Houellebecq.

Aristophanes' Women in Power

Textbooks on Logic, Biology and Statistics

> a bloo bloo bloo, I'm a cultureless anglo monoglot, let me tell you about the world!

The Way of Men

why would u want to learn about such things, misogynist pig

It's not about feminism specifically but there's a good deal of literature attacking trends in the humanities. Harold Bloom and that one Atlantic article are both worth reading.

There's not much criticizing SJWs outside of alt-right edgemasters (ie. ), mostly because they have no influence outside of social media and college campuses.

>good
>anti-feminist literature

There's some works targeting bourgeois "feminism" (which actually is against the interests of actual feminism), which is likely to be the same thing you think is feminism and hate, without realizing that you share your opinion with feminists, and that feminism is also against the social structures which made you, as a man, suffer in such a way that you develope an unhealthy and misinformed view on lefist theory the first place.

...

this

all the anti-feminist lit that comes to mind is like black feminist love politics from the 70s, or bell hooks, or some of the really whacky queer stuff like Preciado's Testo Junkie which seems feminist at first but gets all into hyper accelerations of masculinity to destroy capitalism

...

Mein Kamph.

I want you to leave.

> all the authors are white

no thanks

Angela Davis is black, Öcalan is is a Kurd.

you're telling me Beauvoir does not ignore the realities of class inequality and capitalism?

brekekekekek

there are other /leftypol/ charts?

>all these books were written decades ago
Woah big surprise

>ywn never fight for democratic-confderalism with the YPG
>ywn settle down with your qt kurd comrade

This

Yeah, essential literature on a subject tends to be older works.

Davis is black, but Kurds are not.

So basically you threw in THAT ONE BLACK CHICK into your pic so you'd look "totally not racist - I love having just one black friend!"

There's way more to Feminism that what this chart posts. It needs a lot of improvement.

> probably is a Kurdaboo
> hurr durr Islam goes against feminism!

Kurds view themselves as Muslim. You do not?

Yes I agree. I'm not the person who made the chart either. Kurds are not white though, as whiteness isn't defined by skin tone, but is a political category.

underrated

Tell us more about the Kurds, user.
Nothing else lit related going on ITT

Feminism=Nazism=Communism=Racism=Capitalism=Socialism=Atheism=Autism

ISMS are bad, they divide people and create SCHISMS, what the Earth needs is more LOVE and less ISMS

>If you don't like an opressive religion, you are not allowed to sympathise with the struggle of a group, which members happen to have been socialized into said religion.

wheew, lad

underrated shitpost

Don't be an orientalist pig.

She literally said Islam doesn't ever generate feminism. Kurds are Muslim and apparently feminist.

Sympathize with whomever you wish, but don't deny that Kurds are Muslim just because it contradicts your worldview.

Being socialized in a muslim community doesn't make you a walking islam-machine.
Also you don't sympathize with Kurds for that dumb reason you named.

Progressive Muslims tho.

To begin with, the term "feminist" is often a loosely defined one.
Kurdish women still wear head coverings, still get treated as second class citizens in all the usual ways. Their branch of Islam isn't the same as the others but the religion is still oppressive.

Yeah, I said the same thing when I saw Veeky Forumss recommended starter kit.

This
Within the book she explains how females (not males) induce a psycho systematic socialism upon girls at an Impressionably young age. And how women are hardwired to be more timid therefore, replacing a young girls happiness and potential with order and affability gives her the ability to become a special snowflake.

I hope you are joking. It's hard for me to tell who is ignorant or who is joking.

>Kurdish women still wear head coverings, still get treated as second class citizens in all the usual ways. Their branch of Islam isn't the same as the others but the religion is still oppressive.
Men have restrictions as well. What's your point? Are restrictions inherently wrong? Do we need the same restrictions for everyone? Was this mandated by your deity or is it a conclusion you have come to based on your culture?

:'(
>she explains how females (not males) induce a psycho systematic socialism upon girls at an Impressionably young age.
You think this fits OPs bill for anti-feminist? This is how the patriarchal system perpetuates. Enlisting the captives to be the guards, so to speak.
Wollstonecraft's book was an attack on middle class women's behaviourisms

I know that feel - I know people who went there to be foreign fighters, I kind of want to go but I know I'd be unprepared, almost certainly cowardly under fire and completely useless. Gotta work on that.

What the hell is going on in this thread? Is this tumblr or some shit?

'feminism' is ultimately another construct created by Western liberal imperialists, who want to fashion all the women of the world into interexchangeable 'strong, independent' consumer units.

How's High School going so far?

>psycho systematic workers-owning-the-means-of-productionism

>Are restrictions inherently wrong?
I would say mostly so, but especially those dictated by our ancestors through bogus "sacred texts"

Pretending to be tumblr is a long standing Veeky Forums tradition.

If you know a trade you can go there and help them build infrastructure.

>pretending
is that what you tell yourself

Yeah, I guess you're right.

I mean, who'd lie on the internet?

I study Philosophy - in short, I'm completely useless. Laugh all you like, you wouldn't be wrong. Now that you're talking about it, picking up a trade wouldn't be a bad idea at all.

This. It's a small paperback but it's fucking brutal.

>Kurds are Muslim
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yazidis

Not in that book. It's not even the theme and she touches on it for a bit. What are you "keking" about?

How new are you? This is what happens on anonymous Veeky Forums every waking minute.

>not literature
>but The Blank Slate by Steven Pinker
ass

Fuck off cunt

Anything by Warren Farrell

I'm implying that feminism's core texts are outdated and the conditions they describe no longer exist. The pay gap is a myth, spousal rape and domestic abuse are illegal, more women go to college than men. Sexism in the first world is a meme

> (You)
>>psycho systematic workers-owning-the-means-of-productionism

> workers-owning-the-means-of-productionism
What is the primary means of new sentient life for humans.
A] Women
B] Women
C] Women
D] Women

>Their branch of Islam isn't the same as the others

It's literally mainstream Sunni Islam.

Yazidis and Kurds are two different groups. Yazidis are neither Muslim nor Christian.

Kurds are Sunni Muslim.

>I'm implying that feminism's core texts are outdated
For you.

>Sexism in the first world
So mission accomplished. We can stop feminism now. Makes perfect sense. Not.

Your post is a meme. Just stop talking about what you don't understand

/pol/ plz go

>Wollstonecraft's book was an attack on middle class women's behaviorisms

Are you sure you want to say that?

She spends a lot of the book talking about a utopia that women could great if they just harnessed their special feminine powers properly. She firmly believes in men and women have their own roles and should not really overlap.

So what book is an attack on Wollstonecraft's middle-class woman behaviorisms?

>I'm implying that feminism's core texts are outdated

i don't think you've read them

Xe is right though.

Feminism has moved way beyond these dated works.

explain how the arguments made in the second sex aren't valid today.

>I study Philosophy
Perfecto

>please tell me some books that I can quote, so I'll sound intelligent next time I'm on /r9k/ saying women are all dumb whores

CANCER PLS GO

It's interesting everyone mentioning Houellebecq.

In one of the characters points out how patriarchy is, for obvious reasons, superior to feminism/SJWism because patriarchy actually replicates itself.

Patriarchy creates more humans who believe in patriarchy and in turn create more etc.

SJWs do not create more humans who will believe in SJWisms. It's basically a one-generation movement.

I dunno about that. There's certainly a set of largely Jewish academic families who have been radicals since the 40s and basically present day SJWs the whole way.

Going to a school where they're common is a weird redpill.

Why are there so many pro-SJWs here? I would think that people who enjoy reading literature and have a less narrow minded view of the world would be against stifling free speech in favor of the denial of basic biology and the vast majority of philosophy

It's founded on terrible Sartrean philosophy and her critiques of Freud are very weak.

>We can stop feminism now
Yes, because most of the core tenants of historical feminism (women's suffrage, gender equality, ect.) are accepted by the whole of society and are no longer on any sort of vanguard. Calling yourself a 'feminist' these days makes about as much sense as saying you're an anti-monarchist. It's fighting a battle that's been won already, and even in the third world it's only a matter of time. Globalization and modernization will bring women's rights regardless of how hard Islamists or traditionalists push against it. But your average Westerner can do little to improve the situation, because you can't 'give' someone rights without playing into the hands of neoconservative war hawks.

The New Totalitarians - Roland Huntford ; Feminism in Sweden

Tammy Bruce - The New Thought Police ; Ex Member of NOW

Taken Into Custody: The War Against Fathers, Marriage, and the Family - Stephen Baskerville ; Divorce - Industriali-Complex and punitive legislation

F Roger Devlin - Sexual Utopia in Power

Anatomy of Female Power - Chinweizu ; Critique of African Society/ Feminism

The condition "in the first world" nullifies the whole thing. I admit to some progress in the so-called first world. Everyone agrees there, but what a selfish prig this person is to think we need to stop there.

And this

that didn't explain at all why it's an irrelevant work today.
have you read it?

>spousal rape and domestic abuse are illegal
>something is illegal therefor it doesn't happen
oh wow

not an sjw but it could be because that biology and philosophy is fucked up, wrong, boring, and stupid and literature with a world view where people of any sort can express themselves without being dehumanized can make for some pretty interesting and fulfilling read.

I appreciate your dismantling of gun control arguments.

>something is illegal therefor it doesn't happen
You do realize that this is how 100% of Americans think, right?

>fantasy is fun
Yes, we know.

Yes. If you're familiar with philosophy and you come to encounter Sartre you will either cringe very hard or be very confused because he can't POSSIBLY being saying THAT.

He's retarded and it's bad for a Beauvoirian concept of freedom/authenticity.

Beauvoir is essentially the only reason why we haven't completely dropped Sartre. Because if we drop Sartre, it's difficult to continue teaching Beauvoir seriously. And she's convenient to teach because teaching theory does not require deep reading.

I would argue that calling a woman a woman (praising femininity, etc.) isn't dehumanizing. Calling biology and philosophy entirely "Wrong, boring, and stupid" is extremely ignorant (despite the Oxford comma).

>biology is normative
wew lad

>implying birth control isn't extremely controversial still in 1st world countries
>implying paid leave for pregnant women isn't still absolutely fucking abysmal in America
>implying abortion isn't still a controversial issue in 1st world countries and isn't illegal in a lot of places
You're an idiot. Sorry you can't see past the /pol/ fog clouding your vision of the world but there is still a lot that needs to be done for womens rights

if I wanted my narrative or otherwise literary experience to be limited to a world of white men acting in a vacuum of white male affirmation under some fabricated notion of exceptionalism I'd watch hollywood movies or play video games without character creators