buddha > nietzsche
just fyi
Buddha > nietzsche
Benjamin Perez
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
twitter.com
Matthew Green
...
Caleb Perez
OP, sorry to burst your bubble of emptiness of mind but Buddha:
Probably never ever existed.
If he did exist, he most probably didn't have half of the supernatural attributes often attributed to him.
Even if he had, that does not make his ethical precepts necessarily real or less arbitrary.
Caleb Gutierrez
oblomov is the true enlightened one tbqfwyf
Colton Green
>implying the Buddha wasn't real
>implying Jesus wasn't real also
>implying they both weren't every bit as supernatural as their followers make them out to be
>implying we don't live in a demon-haunted world
Dylan Edwards
>better
>greater
this btw
Carson Morris
this is such a dumb thread.
Christopher Richardson
Keep believing, you might become a panda.
Luis Lee
Yeah, right? OP is probably very wrong and my answer does not make justice to his... well... i'll let /lit fill that with an adjective for me.
Chase Ward
>his... well... i'll let /lit fill that with an adjective for me.
>adjective
>/lit
Adjective? Like fat? Please fuck off back to r/books.
Lucas Harris
>7988166
>fat
user, keep it classy, for discussion's sake. Don't give ideas to others in order to offend OP. He deserves comprehension (also rationality, probably)
Luis Foster
Epictetus > Aristotle > Buddha > Nietzsche
Bentley Wilson
Diogenes>Socrates>Nietzsche>Buddha>Jesus
Not even kidding.
Jace Ward
Heraclitus>Nietzsche>Jesus>Buddha>Diogenes>Socrates
Brody Wright
Stirner > all of them
Leo Lewis
lurk more newfag
Austin Lopez
deleuze>heidegger>>heracltius>hermes>plotinus>plato>parmenides>buddha>aristotle>jesus>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>nietzsche
Angel Morales
Nietzsche seems to agree with Buddha that joy and suffering are intrinsically entwined, but takes the opposite approach for how to live life based on that principle.
Anthony Hill
Diogesche>Socraclitus>Buddrtre>Cameidegger>Ortega y Descartes>My mommy
Colton Peterson
Ludwig Von Wittgenstein>Hellenists>David Foster Wallace>Catholics>Analytics>Continentals
Ryan Barnes
Western Philosophy>Eastern Philosophy>Northern Philosophy>Southern Philosophy
Julian Sanders
North-austral philosophy>levant-moon philosophy>my parents
This is not just playing silly. This is exemplifying the futility and stupidity of making rankings to define the values of cultural manifestations.
Noah Walker
the opposite approach of the dhamma is hedonism and N. is against it.
Ryan Phillips
Actually the value of ideas can be measured economically, but only if you asume that some things are good in themselves. The truth that they hold, the emotions they cause and so on. Sadly those are not the values in hich e measure the value of ideas in today's society's: everything is reduced to efficency, namely the capacity of something to provoke some effect that can translate into the generation of more money. In that regard we live in a very nietzschean society, in which power is the only thing that matters, which ruins the cultural enterprise whic are the sciences, philosophy among them. Truth for instance is, at best, a secondary concern.
Josiah Jones
>implying Deleuze wasn't heavily influenced by Nietzsche
B-but muh Spinoza!
Parker Mitchell
Isn't it hypothesized that Jesus studied under Buddhist monks?
Jeremiah Wilson
It is now
Brandon Evans
All those > the Tao
Bentley Ross
Nathan Perez
The egoist/ubermensch doesn't accept any predetermined value, he sets his own price.
Our concern never deviates from the essential value of things but the matter of deeds of ownership is trivial to real possession.
Wyatt Fisher
Deleuze was a meme and Heidegger was basically all about studying the implications of Nietzsche until his later years.
Lincoln Hernandez
Are you twelve ? This board is for grown-ups, moron.
Luke Reed
Before and during the time of Jesus there was a community of Buddhist or Buddhist-like ascetics in Alexandria but aside from that I don't really know. I vaguely recall something about some scholars saying there was some evidence he had contact with them but I don't remember much about it.
By his time adherents of Buddhism had already for some time traveled throughout and spent time in the middle east and Greece/Egypt/the Levant cities. However, west of Iran it didn't make a huge impact and they were mostly treated as just another curious sect or group philosophers from the east. It was only in eastern Iran and the area to its north and east that there were large amounts of converts.