>They're as easy to read as murakami.
kek
>They're as easy to read as murakami.
kek
Am i wrong?
I assumed that was a supposed to be a subtle jab at My Struggle.
At one point you have to push your narcissistic arrogance to the side, and actually be self-aware for once.
it's called new sincerity user the pissing contest is over
Are Murakami books bad? I mean being easy to read doesn't automatically make them bad.
Yeah, but you shouldn't relentlessly glower. If you're talented and you know it, you should take some pride in it.
And he does, but he still feels like My Struggle is 'bad literature' because there was literally no revision or rewriting.
His prose (at least in translation, but Murakami says they read better in English anyway so we have to assume this is how he writes) is just bland. Books can be easy to read while having good prose, I just finished A Portrait of the Artist and this was definitely true of that book.
Maybe he's just that good, then. He wouldn't be the first genius whose first drafts were golden.