Opinions?

before I buy my plane ticket though... I just have to ask you about this graph. Is IQ heritable? If so, wouldn't it invalidate most of the postmodern egalitarian complaints about our economic system?

I don't care about the book as I haven't read it, but Veeky Forums isn't really for discussion of economics. That would probably be more relevant to or maybe even .

*bzzxxrrp* cannot parse *bsnrrrp*
initiating default repose: iq...tests...are...meaningless

which board should we discuss religion?

...

I can't tell based on one isolated graph. Don't brag about having facts on your side when you clearly have no idea how to interpret data. I don't buy into postmodern thought btw. Feel free to link papers by various authors though.

For real, probably , since it's for the humanities in general

Before you say some shit about liberals, I'd give you the same response if you asked me that some random, unsourced exponential curve """proved""" that the mean life of a particle or the relaxation time of a material was some value.

HAHA! I fucking KNEW IT! I"M ALWAYS RIGHT

YEEHAH! TAKE THAT , OBAMA!

I don't actually care about your opinion seeing as how you have no original thoughts or interesting insights to offer, I was just making banter. Now get out of my thread, you didn't read the book

>Get out of my shitty bait thread
Sure

How would this invalidate complaints about economic our economic system?

Blacks have a lower average IQ than other races, and genetics almost definitely play a role in it.

idk

Poors and darkies are lazy dumbasses who fully deserve their poverty. While the oft-maligned rich are high iq patricians and we should worship them as Gods

i've not been able to find a solid source that gives black/white IQ results by matching family income levels. i've seen plenty of charts to that effect, but they never come with a source.

This site isn't really for the discussion of economics.

the libertarian-inspired neoliberalism from the 1970s to present is a proven failure as unemployment levels are consistently higher and economic growth and total productivity growth are consistently lower than they were in the 1945-1973 period where keynesian policy was explicitly embraced, unions were supported and governments owned more utilities.

so the likes of sowell have been proven wrong by all available data.

literally 5 seconds on google

lagriffedulion.f2s.com/testing.htm#APPENDIX B

This site isn't really for the discussion of anything other than cartoons, video games and porn.

sites.biology.duke.edu/rausher/lec23_05.html

>I didn't read the book
ok then

>also, I don't know what the phillips curve is
xddd

this. in my fantasies my hypothetical gf gets gangbanged by californian venture capitalists while I sit by and admire their mighty randian cocks

im familiar with that page, no links to sources. he cites SAT data in his appendix but with no link to the source. where did the SAT publish this data, i haven't seen it verified. you'd like to have a more objective source than an HBD blog.

i strengthen

SATAN TRIPS
MARX WAS RIGHT
youtube.com/watch?v=rHomETco0MI&t=10

I hate niggers, all capitalism is usury, the vast majority of humans should not own property but be property.

Because I'm obsessed with niggers and allow this to render me passive about those who profit from the breakdown of social bonds

i don't know what negative externalities are: the book

Sowell is just another brain-dead monetarist that fell for the asset-price illusion i.e. the economy is better off if everyones net worth rises even when their debt servicing obligations also rise and the access price to housing and other property keeps increasing. He believes a rentier economy is actually progress forward beyond industrialization rather then returning back into the pre-industrial usury-and-rent economy of feudal Europe when military conquest was the sole major enterprise and economies polarized between creditors and debtors.

Sowell is fundamentally methodologically flawed since he simply views economic relations in terms of individual psychology based on a very crude supply-and-demand schedule of satiation.

Try looking into guys like Michael Hudson and Larry Randall Wray if you want an alternative view.

>>also, I don't know what the phillips curve is
Ya, that's the thing that tells central bankers that they should intentionally engineer unemployment to prevent inflation from hurting the wealthy living off dividend pay-outs.

In the 50s governments aimed at maximizing domestic employment and economic potential but then Friedmanite financial planners convinced them it was better to aim at maximizing the price of real estate, stocks and financial securities relative to wage levels.

>the poor get poorer
literally only ever happens under socialism

>In the 50s governments aimed at maximizing domestic employment and economic potential but then Friedmanite financial planners convinced them it was better to aim at maximizing the price of real estate, stocks and financial securities relative to wage levels.

lol, because volatile inflation sure was helpful :^) good post otherwise

though we should be doing ngdp targeting rather than inflation t b h

>usury
what an old meme