Is this guy actually worth reading?

Is this guy actually worth reading?

Not really. His better counterparts are Peter Kreeft for more pleb introductions and Edward Feser for the best contemporary Christian philosophy that isn't purely read by academics.

no of course he fucking isn't

Any other thoughts? From the little I've read of him, I thought his argument of the "witness of the Holy Spirit" as a foundational belief was interesting.

He's an evangelical so it's all quite dubious t b h

Everything that begins has a cause, the universe began therefore the universe has a cause.
Prove me wrong losers

The universe never began, it just developed.

Everything that begins has an end neo, If God began the universe then God has an end, he is therefore not God

Shutter shades were a 2009 thing and YOLO was a 2013 thing. Whoever made that didn't know his 21st century culture very well

I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, the first and the last.

Translated from Aramaic:
I am Alap and I am Tau, The First and The Last, The Origin and The Fulfillment.

Also God is eternal. Bound to no thing, but all things are bound to Him.

Fuck off user, I don't have any ropes around me.

Neither does the Earth but it's bound to all the laws of the universe. Just as you are.

You ought to.

>Everything that begins has a cause
[citation needed]
>the universe began
[citation needed]
>therefore the universe has a cause
[citation needed]

No. Lowest tier of Christian apologetics

Yeah Feser is great.

Do you rebuke the law of causality?

Do you believe the Big Bang Theory?

>Do you rebuke the law of causality?
There is no such 'law'.

>Do you believe the Big Bang Theory?
It doesn't say what you think it says.

As far as we are concerned there is.

>It doesn't say what you think it says.
I'll just say the same stupid shitty thing back. What now?

Who's highest tier then

You are scientifically illiterate.

That would be you.