What moral system do you follow, Veeky Forums?

What moral system do you follow, Veeky Forums?

Other urls found in this thread:

plato.stanford.edu/entries/reflective-equilibrium/
youtu.be/9ogQ0uge06o
youtube.com/watch?v=r6QMmrM4BmI
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

confusion and misery

"Do unto others as you would have them do unto you".
Been a good life so far.

My own. I mostly just avoid making an ass of myself unless it furthers some greater end.

do whatever draws the least attention to myself while garnering the greatest benefit (for myself)

memes are justice

hypocrisy
trying to get past it with selfreflection
its hard to differentiate between right or wrong as you have to stick to principles and have to have a huge construct you believe in.
which is scary
and then it all comes back to me being a hypocrite

Theological voluntarism. It's the only one that isn't a social construction.

The Übermensh one, I do as I please.

>my life is eventful enough for the application of morals

I act like a jerk and then I regret what I have done

A form of communitarianism, I guess. I try to reason about morality with the people I know, even with the cringey ones. I hope to change them if my views are correct or be changed by their views

I fucking hate the phrase "let's agree to disagree".

Unified esotericism

Meme magic accelerationism.

>benevolence and rightness are internal and the natural state of man

I know, it means that a person is completely incompetent of arguing.

Yup. But if you hear it to often you might be the source of the problem.
Still mostly i found people cling to much to their own reasoning.

My own.

Agreed, I guess we've all been guilty of this at some point, especially in oral arguments. That's why having a relatively indifferent third party around is helpful to turn the scales towards the right side

Spooks

>relatively indifferent
>third party
implying having more than 1 friend
implying you can find a relatively indifferent thrid party, it's hard enough for me to find a conversation partner i can talk to on a ceratin basis
man i'd love to exist in your world

reverse golden rule

You get it.

how many have you raped?

So would I, that's why I'm trying to make it happen with friends etc.
I never said I actually succeed, but I guess it's worth it if you're up for it.

you sure you want to be raped?

Edgy Nietzschean who has read 3 pages of beyond good and evil

Traditionalist. I do great but feel shitty. Anyone think it may have something to do with morality or am I too drunk and not making sense?

Is that selfreflection or an invitation?

Purely pathological. Based on what I feel is wrong or right.

You don't do great if you feel shitty.
We're not in the 1960s.
Morality could be a source. Or your job. Or your life. Fix your shit, you can't find out whats the problem is go see a doc.

Um...
*Fix your shit, if you can't find the source of your problems go see a doc
(I'm to autistic to leave that there as it is)

Tribalism.

I'm a Kierkegaardian. Leap of faith all day erry day. Ethical > Aesthetic.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

I miss my ex. It's been over a year and I still think about her first thing when I wake up and think every girl with dark brown hair is her etc. I'm making plenty of money and have great friends and a 4.0 GPA and all that nonsense but fug. I am too drunk. I'll quit

How do I do this user

Do the Kierkegaard life?
Find a truth that's true for you.
Take a leap of faith. Don't worry about belief. Faith is paradoxically about doubt.
Live existentially (that is, in personal communion to what you have put your meaning into)
Learn to understand yourself, find what it is the object you place your faith in really wants you to do.

That's for the religious section. This should take place over the ethical section (that is, because all religious acts are under Kierkegaardian ideals ethical acts by nature and transcend other ethical norms. If you have a conflict, teleologically suspend the ethical.)

Ethics also transcends the aesthetic.

To live aesthetically generally comes with nature, learn to "be" that is, to have an authentic experience living in the world.

Read "Steppenwolf". Changed my life.

Any questions?

Same here. I still think of her often enough.
My heart starts racing when i see someone similar. Been one and a half years now.
It will pass, or so i hope.

Do what's best for self, family, friends, friends' families.

She's coming to the same college as me in August... Should I go for it? Pretty sure she hates me now but surely I can say something... Life would be so good, ya know

I have no details. I'm not going to tell you to do anything, that's up to your evaluation.

Well, both, I guess.

True neutral, bruh.

>there are multiple systems
lol

You're correct. There are actually none.

True Neutral

Strictly speaking, you're right. But, supposing we trust psychology, we do develop moral intuitions throughout our life and through them, we can make out some moral principles, using, for example, some variation of this method:
plato.stanford.edu/entries/reflective-equilibrium/

Your guilt is never wrong and always sincere.

'muh feels' isn't a moral system.

The only system is a divine system.

well feel free to kik me at fallenhsb

Return to norm

Whatever happens to be convenient. I do, however, have a natural inclination to kindness.

I put value into thoughts and ideals which reciprocate value.

>'muh feels' isn't a moral system.
Sure it is.

'muh feels' is the only moral system anyone has ever followed.

There is not one that sticks with you all of your life.

Growing up, it was not to take advantage of anyone. Now, it is more taking care of myself, because I neglected that.

So, first it was extreme public service and now it is self-babying. I swing on extremities, in the wrong order.

youtu.be/9ogQ0uge06o

I haven't thought nor read about ethics or morals much, but I just try to be honest, funny without insulting, and make others happy without being a beta bitch.

I fusion of many, as the complexity necessitates.

A conglomeration of virtue ethics, utilitarianism, deontology, buddhism, taoism, etc. Primarily I aim to decrease suffering in the world as I see it as bad, and much of the suffering is a result of the social system, so I am a socialist who wants to reduce the damage we are doing. I also believe through better culture we can create more free and self actualizing individuals, so the good flute players can play their flutes and we all benefit. I also wish we used technology prosocially.

I'm an atheist who sees the value of faith. My humanism has a lot of faith and optimism. At heart Marxism is a very pro human, positive view on man and her potentialities.

I think it's our duty to help people who need help if we can. It's our duty to try to he patient, compassionate, thoughtful, courageos, wise. If we all do this, we will all benefit from one another and thereby make it even easier for more people to actualize.

What I'm saying is that it's all interconnected, and seeking knowledge to understand the interplay of ethics, faith, society, psychology, happiness, economics, etc is insanely useful and meaningful.

ha ha, I remember when Bart was helping Homer fill out a form and Bart asked what religion Homer is, and he tried to remember, " ... what's the one with the good intentions that don't work out in real life?"

You know the guy who said that also said a lot of other things which He also thought should be included in people's morality. He didn't intend it to just be something people hang up on their walls to feel good about themselves.

Natural Law ethics, naturally.

So in other words you believe nothing.

Logically it doesn't makes sense, either. Why would another person want done to them what I want done to me? And why would I want what another person wants--done to me?

But if it's S&M, then it makes sense.

>virtue ethics, utilitarianism, deontology, buddhism, taoism

Cool a bunch of things that have little to do with each other. How is it being 18?

youtube.com/watch?v=r6QMmrM4BmI

>virtue ethics
Atheists have no virtues and cannot define virtue,
>utilitarianism
According to what?
>deontology
So you're a typical bootlicking atheist.

I believe many things.

The fool judges what he does not know.

Do either of you actually think you know what I believe, based on condensing so much into so little. You're lack of imagination disables you from even trying to put it together. Instead of asking questions or seeking clarification, you lash out. I pity the fool.

I have many virtues, an in this case can define them as Aristotle did.

According to what else, utility, suffering, happiness.

Nope, a badass motherfucking atheist. Get it right wankstain.

You sound like the other dweebs, jealous and lacking in creative criticality.

I pity the dweeb.

>I have many virtues,
No you don't, because you're an atheist.
>According to what else, utility, suffering, happiness.
Why is this correct, oh right:
>muh feelings
>Nope, a badass motherfucking atheist
Oh, you're just underage.
>lacking in creative criticality.
Said the societal drone.

Machiavellian aestheticism

Objectivism and memes graded by dankness.

Islamic Marxist Morality.

"War is better than oppression."

And

"It is possible to love what is bad for you and for you to hate that which is good for you."

I hope you die then tbqh

Tbh, I'm trying to do this in my life.

Refraining from saying what is untrue cultivates silence within oneself,

and for me to stop stealing phones in public transit...

Both of us will die, but the bourgeois kafirs will go to the Fire, and those who submit to God and do good (socialism) in this world, will be rewarded.

I am a follower of Christ.

I kinda like this guy

The point is not what you would have done to you, but what you would not have done.

Speak english GOOK

Socialism is a form of government.

Charity is not giving to the government, it is helping other people with your own two hands. Taking your time to care for someone else, and doing it for nothing in return.

That is English, I'm sorry you are not able to follow. Read it again.

It made sense the first time, fool.

Charity should be abolished. And the political form of Socialism is called "Democracy".

Socialism is an economic system, not a system of government. A State may be involved (as in the USSR, PRC, DPRK, Cuba, etc.), or it may not (as in Spanish Catalonia, many independent communes, and the society the early Christians lived in as described in the Book of Acts, for example).

Charity is good but it fails to address the property relations which being about poverty to begin with. To do good is not merely to feed the poor, but to bring the poor out of poverty. To do this, property must be abolished. No man must be uplifted or worshipped. All submission is reserved to Allah. To want capitalism is to want oppression and submission to a hierarchical mankind.

The one-eyed Dajjal (Anti-Christ) has already entered everyone's home. It is the back of the dollar bill.

That's nice, but it doesn't say that.

But we're all socialists here. We're all given equal footing. By your creed, you should despise this community and want no part in it. It's suspect that what you are saying is your truth. I think not.

I think you just have abstract thinking.

>muslim

Socialism only occurs within government.

>What moral system do you follow, Veeky Forums?
whichever is most convenient

"Do unto others as you would have done unto you"

If you wouldn't want it done to you, don't do it to someone else.

This. Be an individual or be a cuck.

ok you can't even formulate your complaint competently so I'm going to have to stomp you it's too tempting I want to say I'm sorry but I don't like to lie.

To agree to disagree is completely reasonable, only the hairiest, most unkempt of neckbeards would be unable to agree to suspend an argument in return for increased interpersonal harmony.

Furthermore, people approach life from different perspectives, and so form different conclusions. Some of those conclusions will contradict in spite of their almost impossible-to-resist from within-perspective suggestion of truth.

be reasonable, u cunts

>reasonable

Yes. Islamic socialism and Muslim Marxism is a thing. Just like there's Christian Marxism, and Atheistic Marxism.

Your point?

>2016
>thinking morals can bind humans to certain actions

you hit bullseye on BGE, still reading the intro

>implying

That he was wrong.

No, it doesn't. State socialism is just far more effective.

But if a government is to exist, it should be a government that represents the ummah, which submits to the will of God. The will of God is peace and socialism. To have a society of believers following the will of a few elite secular capitalists makes absolutely no sense at all. Their godlessness leads them to greed, drugs, and sexual deviance. We either need the godlessness of the Soviets (which respected religion and did God's work without acknowledging God), or we need something entirely different.

The world was given to all mankind for is to live and work in it. It is wrong to believe that only a select few should own that which they did not create. And then to oppress others and deify themselves (as Trump has, for example), is completely contrary to Islam.