How do I write like him?

How do I write like him?

Other urls found in this thread:

iqcomparisonsite.com/occupations.aspx
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Be an ivy-league educated genius. Smoke dank and watch cartoons.

>Ivy-league educated
>Cornell

Ebin meme dude

S H I T P O S T
H
I
T
P
O
S
T

Actually you need to start with a >150 IQ to really produce original work, no matter what jealous mediocre people might say.

You're mediocre

Actually I'm a highly cited mathematician with a 157 IQ. What are you?

Feminine man who takes female hormones, uni student, Mensa member.

I see you were too scared to tell me your IQ.

gay porn credits dont count as citations

>Feminine man who takes female hormones
>Mensa member

mensa members are known degenerates

>being this jealous
Is this what you wasted 4-7 years of your life doing?

What's with all the IQ memers recently? you faggots should go back to Veeky Forums and continue to jerk yourself over a number that you may or may not even have gotten to make up for your lack of accomplishments and talents

Actually I have a PhD and have a tenure-track position doing something I love. I also happen to have a 157 IQ and enough intelligence to recognize the utility of psychometrics. Evidently you do not.

Degenerates come in many different forms, user.

Brainlet detected

We're all pseuds here anyway.

>I also happen to have a 157 IQ
certainly not 156 or 158

>bragging on the internet period

:') your self esteem is so low (and you won't admit this to yourself) that you have to validate yourself online on a chinese cartoon forum. did you not get laid in high school? did your fat girlfriend Ursula cheat on you? either way, I wish you well in the future

>mensa members are known degenerates
so was pinecone tho

>muh degeneracy
People with higher IQs are more likely to experiment sexually and with substances than brainlets.

Explain why those teenage boys who smoke weed and play COD all day exist.

>muh intellect drug meme

Having a high IQ doesn't mean you make good decisions all the time as a juvenile and won't fall for an addictive activity.

I have an IQ of about 115. How fucked am I?

You're sitting on the borderline for having the capacity to succeed in law or medicine so get your ass to work.

I graduated from high school at 16 and majored in Computer Science. Now I shit post on Veeky Forums. Still good?

>Now I shit post on Veeky Forums
no

How do you know what occupations go with selected ranges? Got a chart or something?

For law, they've found that LSAT scores track well with IQ, and the score that serves as essentially the cut off for whether you have acceptable odds of passing the bar later or not tracks to an IQ or just a little over 115.

I don't remember what it's called, but there's a good bit of evidence that something in the 115-120 range is where diminishing returns come in for success in intellectually demanding professions. People with lower than that get in, but they're not getting into Harvard Law or Medical. However, plenty of people at Harvard Law and medical are going to be right around 120.

iqcomparisonsite.com/occupations.aspx

Too scared to tell us your Myers-Briggs? Your income bracket? Length, girth, diameter?

ESTJ
$300k
8x6 calculate diameter yourself

I tested at 129 on the adult scale when I was in 4th grade and I'm fucking retarded.

>Everyone talking about IQ
Could you repeat the question

You're a fraudulent little bitch but it's more fun to play along, so I will. Why do you post here?

What? Obviously I'm joking.

I post here because I'm addicted to this timesink hellhole.

If it makes any of you feel better I have an IQ of 160+ and I really detest Pynchon's writing. I feel his ramblings are far more at home in a scientific journal than in literature - that is to say that they're detailed and specific to the extent that they detract from any literary clout that his novels might have held.

I have no idea what my IQ is because I am afraid I won't make it past 100 of I take the test.

I don't feel retarded enough to be hopeless but I definitely feel outclassed compared to a lot of people when it comes to recognizing patterns and discerning advanced logic.

Yeah well I'm Thomas Pynchon and have an IQ of 190 so you can suck my wrinkly old schlong.

I fucking hate your books pal

Also, obligatory Myers-Briggs, income, and length/girth/diameter:
INTP/ENTP/ENTJ (depends on my mood honestly; I've been clinically depressed for years and also enjoy a bit of substance use)
~$1500
7x6

That being said, I've come to realize the value of hard work and knowledge over natural intelligence.

I'm sure you'd do it yourself if you didn't have those fucking rat teeth, Pinecone.

>op asks about writing
>retards start crying about MUH IQ MUH 180 IQ !
Jesus fuck, IQ tards are the new fedora. Oh wait fedoras actually talk about IQ a lot. So you are just basic fedoras, not neo-ones

Honestly, it's not really worth it to - I wouldn't do it for any reason other than if necessary. I got an IQ test when I was younger along with a group of other psychological exams in tests for OCD tendencies and Aspergers.

Except Pynchon's IQ is one of the more specific pieces of personal information we have on him. Do you think you're being gang-stalked by men in fedoras?

Yeah I'd say it's definitely a crucial part of the way he writes and how his writing is meant to be analyzed/interpreted. It's also a big distinction because, if I remember right, successful authors oftentimes don't have exceptionally high IQ's.

Source on his IQ ? Pretty about him is made up with the exception of like 3 interviews

>iq thread
>everyone is significantly above genius level
>people posting "i tested 160 and im really dumb!" as a subtle way of lie-bragging
>self-estimated iqs of above 140
>"iq doesnt mean anything" people who dont understand some proven correlations


Ok its done, no more, weve already had this thread

It's from an old girlfriend of his. From his writing though - I would definitely say it's up there.

I was really interested in OP's question. Better luck next time, I guess.

>Ok its done, no more, weve already had this thread
We have it three times a day.

>brainlets really believe this
It's like your IQ is too low to understand that IQ does not define people beyond their logical reasoning and processing skills. Also, you should do some research in the statistical significance of IQ results.

The answer is: you need to be so smart that your ability to convey information overshadows the way your information is expressed. I'm the one who described his writing as unnecessarily analytical, and it turns out he wrote copy for Boeing for years before becoming an actual author.

>that one guy who doesn't understand what correlation is
>that one guy who doesn't understand sample sizes
>that one guy who is 'done' with the thread but is still monitoring constantly

Veeky Forums pretty muchs disproves any IQ study, we have a lot of people with 140+ IQ who are either NEET or not successful at all in any field. At the most we have some STEM students but that's pretty much it.

>hey what's unique about Pynchon's writing
Well, the rumor is that his IQ was pretty huge and given the nature of his work...
>RRREEEEEEE IQ ISN'T REAL AND IS PROBABLY RACIST TOO
Who's off topic here?

...

>that fallacy

>tfw too buzy

continue discussing your iqs then, im just pointing out that we have these threads like 9 times a day and its never not cringeworthy

...

>spits out the fallacy fallacy as he posts examples of people who are not in this thread saying dumb things

>implying it wasn't you who made that post

My cult leader had an iq of 175 and he was an asshole. Correlation does not imply causation but I think he led that get to his head.

>spits the fallacy fallacy fallacy
>is still in the thread shitposting

>I think he led that get to his head.
>my cult leader
kek it sounds like he rused you.

>My cult leader had an iq of 175
pro tip
every time someone claims to have an IQ higher than say 140 they're probably lying or mistaken unless you have some evidence of the fact
175 in particular is such an absurd number that it puts him in top 100 in America and is almost certainly BS unless you have very good reason to think otherwise

write obscure references into your book
watch losers and academia eat it up like gold shit

I might have gotten it wrong but it was pretty high. Unless he was lying. I found that factoid in his publications so theres that

>obligatory Myers-Briggs, income, and length/girth/diameter
As the poster who initially asked for those, die faster.

I mean there is really no way to satisfy you all, but I'll try to answer a few of the things that keep popping up:

>Why does everyone on Veeky Forums have a 140+ IQ?
Realistically, individuals with higher IQ's will be the ones dedicated to discussion or research in academic fields at a serious level. I understand Veeky Forums is far from a fully-academic board for discussion, but the reasoning that pages like "I Fucking Love Science" are only tangentially related to the field of science are because only a surface level discussion will hold people who are generally disinterested in anything intellectually stimulating.

>What does IQ have to do with this?
Pynchon's writing is definitely related to his intelligence - without a doubt. You don't want to write like Pynchon because his writing isn't really that good, and even when it is good, it is far too analytical to be stimulating beyond the stimulation reading a medical journal might give you.

Anything else?

Golf doesn't even exist.

>he thinks golf exists
Brainlets must lead such strange lives.

Just curious - what works of Pinecone's have you read? Personally I wouldn't consider any of his works outside of maybe his first three to be particularly analytical.

I don't really get why anyone posing as an intellectual would say that. At that point, you can just say nothing really exists, and we are only a product of our gestures and actions which ultimately have no meaning, but even then that's a pretty flimsy concept unless you go full Stirner.

I've read Lot 49 (favorite), GR, V, and Inherent Vice. Never read Mason & Dixon.

What about actually responding to OP?

>Realistically, individuals with higher IQ's will be the ones dedicated to discussion or research in academic fields at a serious level.
the average IQ on Veeky Forums is definitely above 100 don't get me wrong but it's nowhere near the levels you'd expect if you took these threads at face value
realistically it's probably somewhere closer to 110 or 115
and 115 is not a bad score, it puts you in the top 15% of people which while nothing spectacular is nothing to scoff at either

140 puts you in the top 0.4% of people, one in 250, higher than (or by the absolute most generous estimates equal to) the average Harvard graduate and it's plainly absurd to think any popular website or forum has a median IQ of anything near that

What you don't understand is what IQ measures and how it's meant to be used, the fact that intelligence is relative (we determine if a person is 'smart' by a monolithic 'a little' or 'yes' or 'no' answer since we utilize executive functioning to sort through an individual's idiosyncratic compilation of traits), and the fact that IQ measures academic functioning and learning conditions that interfere with functionality more than anything else. This is actually the only need for a clinical definition of intelligence, for statistical purposes to help clients function better in life. Retake your psych 101 class instead of spouting memes.

I did in discussing how IQ was related to Pynchon's writing. Step one, be smart, step two, write in an unnecessarily detailed way that only a genius would be able to write in.

>the average IQ on Veeky Forums is definitely above 100 don't get me wrong but it's nowhere near the levels you'd expect
this. consensus here keeps saying it's 140. I'd say it's more like 135.

t. 145 IQ guy

kek
Yeah I definitely agree with you about exactly how high the IQ of the board is. I'd say it's definitely above-average, but if the average was ~140 then that would be the largest enclave of geniuses completely wasting their genius since MENSA.

Any educated person knows that psychology as a whole is a joke. I'm not sure why you people are discussing IQ, might as well be discussin the horoscope or what twilight character you resemble the most.

>trying to brag about shit on fucking Veeky Forums

>ny educated person knows that psychology as a whole is a joke
What's up with this meme?

Which one of you faggots paid tribute...

Veeky Forums hasn't been exclusively basement dwellers since like 2008.

He's not that good. I like him, but he's not worth emulating.

Listen to Lotion, especially the album Nobody's Cool.

Back to Europe.

I have an IQ of 121. What can I achieve with this IQ?

a graduate degree. but not postgrad.

how did you get from someone jokingly suggesting cornell isnt good enough to be ivy to saying "back to europe"?

whats it like being handicapped?

rip

Brainlet lmao

If you like him enough to read multiple works by him but still find him overly analytical, I'd recommend M&D. It's mostly focused on prose and building characters, and while it has his usual "voice", it's far more lyrical and less analytical than, say, GR.

>ITT people lie about their IQs without understanding the concept of standard deviation and the statistical improbability of their claims

Why would I lie about my 121, lmao.

Are you telling me every time you see an outlier you clap your hands to your ears and shout no no no?

Veeky Forums is full of autists. There's a correlation with autism and high IQs.

kek