do you even think about the threads before opening them
Jace Thomas
What is the point of that image?
Also Michel Foucault is the most prominant I can think of, The Archaeology of Knowledge particularly which moves you to Gilles Deleuze
Gavin Rogers
...
Juan Barnes
why
Also don't trust this user , the 20th century frogs completely misread Nietzsche. All you'd get is a synthesis of Marx and their hallucinatory version of Nietzsche.
Matthew Ortiz
Nietzsche >"just do it u pusst, be the übermensch. don't expect nothing for free. these worthless automatons are no better than ants, fuck em. Be poor, be sad, suffer, it'll do you some good. Yids are scum, no pity for the weak"
marx >"wahhhhh poor people are exploited and capitalism hurts their poor widdle feewings, people who are succesful need to be cut down to size so cripples and bums fill their worthless sewers with gourmet on someone else's dime. it's like so unfair omg"
People much more erudite than myself have probably put the two together but if you have any understanding of either's works I think you would conclude they disagree on most of the fundemental questions.
Dominic Thompson
They don't misread Nietzsche, they just cut the bullshit out
Eli Fisher
Dialectic of Enlightenment by Horkheimer and Adorno