Why haven't any atheists read the Summa Theologica? Are they afraid their pride will be injured? Everyone knows the five ways are grounded in the larger work, and yet every day we have fedoras on here claiming to have refuted them so hard they don't need to read the book.
Proofs of God
James Roberts
Other urls found in this thread:
nature.com
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Leo Brooks
disregard your irony the cosmological argument is still pretty strong, he didn't invent it though, it all stems from the greeks
Nicholas Turner
Because they don't realise that they run on faith too, it's placed on science instead of the absolute
Hunter Brown
>Because they don't realise that they run on faith
wut
certainly they are not scientific because they cannot be proven (quite a lot of the most interesting things cannot be proven and can be only gussed) but it doesn't mean they are based on faith, it's sound philosophical speculations
Owen Lee
>atheists must be hard empiricists
Kek, did your preacher tell you that they eat babies too?
Landon Reyes
>he actually thinks anything is real
>he doesnt realize his reality is a computer chip created by a higher life form
Andrew Johnson
Not invented, but perfected, which is really Aquinas in a nutshell. A lot of what he did wasn't strictly original, but he understood everything, he put everything together. He took all the pieces and assembled the puzzle.
I am in awe of Aquinas. He is probably one of the ten smartest people in all of history, from all over the world. He understood everything, and I think if you gave him something new he'd be able to understand that too. He really is a genius.
Benjamin Rodriguez
...
Kayden Cruz
you lose
Hudson Powell
we all do m8... we all do...