obviously you wont be building your dyson sphere around a dying star
Dyson spheres
Brandon James
Anthony Morgan
True that
Brayden Myers
>What does Veeky Forums think about dyson spheres?
They're a product of the Kardashev Scale, which is itself absurd.
Why would you consider a society more advanced if they consume more energy.
Per-capita energy use in the U.S. is going down.
Does that mean we're becoming less advanced?
Evan Rodriguez
no it doesnt. But as a whole humanity needs more energy than 2 thousand years ago
Angel Morales
Yes and in the future we will probably need a huge amount of energy to take care of our growing population and technological evolution.
In the last 200 years the energy used per-capitia energy have gone upwards
Brandon Stewart
For things like space travels we will need a humongous amount of energy
Cameron Jenkins
>in the future we will probably need a huge amount of energy to take care of our growing population
More advanced societies don't grow indefinitely.
>For things like space travels we will need a humongous amount of energy
Sure, but the galaxy's biggest solar farm doesn't seem like a good way to about it.
Gabriel Smith
What a worthless comment.
This is the type of garbage neil tyson would say if he couldn't think of anything useful
Evan Wilson
but it is probably right, you pop-sci faggot
Jackson Morales
No, if anything
This is an NDT reply.
Anybody who thinks they are remotely achievable doesn't know how big the sun is. Anybody who thinks they'd be useful doesn't know anything about solar energy generation or power transmission.
The only thing worse than popsci is fantasy-tier scifi.