Represent a Veeky Forums board with a major author

no way, /pol/ is the literary equivalent of a 70 year old sweaty man that posts hate speech on his facebook that absolutely nobody reads and then shits himself while masturbating

so you?

#####rekgt

>hate speech

free spiich xD how can there be hate speech if free is subjeggiv

>hate speech

There's no such thing.

Hate speech is just code for free speech I don't like.

edgy

>Veeky Forums

Who tf is that?

Brett Easton Edgelord

>hate speech
what the fuck is hate speech

literally lit

There's nothing wrong with that phrase

edgy

...

/sp/

No, he doesn't represent the board. There are not discussions on /r9k/ that come close to any Veeky Forums figure.
They are sad and angry teens, and they enjoy their pain, are reflected and so couldn't see that - this they might share with him. But they ignore anything that's longer than 3 sentences.

Is this real or staged?

is this real

Everything's wrong with that phrase. Who decides what is hate and which hate is OK and which is not?

Can I hate on spinach? Can I hate on Microsoft? Yes? So who gets to choose what I can or can't hate on?

Can I hate on pedos? Yes?

Can I hate on the French?

Can I hate on Mexicans? But if I'm European, can I now? No? What if I'm Mexican myself, can I hate on my own?

"Hate speech" is one of those many bullshit terms used to force you not to use arguments. It's the same thing Nazis did with racial slurs (two can play at this game).

>homophobe
>sexist
>racist
>hate speech

Any of these and more are red flags signifying that you are speaking with an irrational person who is trying to shortcut any logical conversation to impose their political agenda, which they know to be weak.

/lgbt/

>is this real

real as in is the knife really in his guts?
no
real as in did he really pose like that?
yes

more like /b/

what a faggot lmao

wrong he's /b

I get you, user. But you have to admit: stuff like this makes sense in a purely logical way, but it ignores common sense.

It's "hate speech" for an Alabaman man who calls a black person a nigger because there's enough context behind that sort of interaction that everyone who isn't either a contrarian or tacitly in favor of using the word can acknowledge what's going on.

Ultimately some things come down to common sense. Pointing out logical flaws with this, and semantic contradictions, etc., just gets a little sophistic. I mean, wouldn't you agree that you know it when you see it?

I'll concede that whether or not we should form policy based on this is a different argument.