Is there a more based reviewer?

Is there a more based reviewer?

Based 'reviewers' are called critics user.

forgive my poor synonym choice

Is there a more based OP?

...

I like Hadrian. Nathan NR Gaddis seems batshit insane but he has good taste.

Nice feets

Sauce?

Can someone explain the feet thing to me

Sometimes you have to give the die hard Conservatives props for their stubbornness and amusement value.

Feet are sensitive parts of the body. They give the illusion of control to the fetishist that they're controlling every sensation in the person's body.

Notice that foot fetishism and necrophilia aren't commonly matched together.

haha yeah not wanting to be a pleasure seeking hedonist is so old fashioned and stupid

>taking literature as seriously as real life is intelligent

>I am don't like explicit, extremely degenerate sex
>hey let's read Sade
why did she do this

so brave

>onward christian soldiers

Sorry Kathy, didn't mean to offend.

Everyone's a based reviewer.

>she read Justine start to finish

How in the hell did someone meme her into doing this? I find it impossible to believe she could continue the whole way through without deriving some aesthetic pleasure from the book. She's probably repressed and kinky IRL.

I think unleashing repressed sexuality is sexy tbqh. Sexier still than the whore-filial daughter limbo the college girls prance around in.

Kill all Goodreads members

There is fun to the fact of denying yourself something that you'll ultimately crave and need to have--like after you starve yourself of food for awhile, the food can then taste extraordinary.

It's just naughtiness. Silly, really.

thats the dumbest shit i heard in my life

I like every external part of a woman's body but there is just something charming about feet.

Mine are so huge, hairy, and ugly, but that girl's are smooth and delicate. I feel the same way about hands for the same reason. I think there might be some conditioning as well, one of my first experiences with sex involved a foot and my penis. One of my best experiences with sex also involved a foot and my penis, but that was few years later.

Now could I get some pizza dressing on that web video?

So does that review ever actually come to a point or is it just like the first 5 paragraphs with the critic talking about everything else except for the books he's supposed to be reviewing? There's framing your critique and then there's just loving to hear your own voice.

its way longer, probably 35 paragraphs or so

i don't have sauce, found it on /tv/

You go to /tv/?

I browse several boards

Jack of all trades, master of none

>probably 35 paragraphs
I could not write 35 paragraphs about GRRM's books if you paid me by the word. I'm guessing he barely mentions them in that entire novella.

man /tv/ may be a faster moving board but the ratio of the rush of sewage and dull memery to something actually interesting is miniscule.

Very sensitive, curvy, soft, gender dimorphic, often covered up - so the sight of them bare is more erotic and titillating, creates a sense of nakedness and vulnerability when given attention.

Submissive people will enjoy being beneath the lowest part of the body and the one that is most often in contact with the ground. Dominant people might enjoy exposing and tickling them.