Elementary particles are pointlike but have mass [math]\rightarrow[/math] infinite density [math]\rightarrow[/math] they're black holes
Now I postulate the following: if we bring for example two electrons close enough together to be within each other's event horizon, they fuse together to a single "doublectron" with twice the mass, and twice the charge. It would again be a pointlike elementary particle because you can't tear apart or break up a black hole and look inside it. Naturally, it would also be stable. Has such an experiment be done before?
>Elementary particles are pointlike but have mass →→ infinite density →→ they're black holes
FAIL delete this thread and save yourself the emberassment
Ian Sullivan
/a/nimemes belong to
Michael Clark
Thats not right, newfriend. You can post any SFW picture here, too. Reactionshit doesnt need to be on topic. Not a hard concept
Isaiah Sanchez
kek If you have the energy to complain about that, you have no life either. That search was the most autistic thing I've seen for quite a while.
Michael Richardson
Holy fucking shit. LMAO! What a sad cunt. I wish we had Mods that would actually do something against off-topic cunts, spammers and bots. Until then, this is pretty much just /b/Lite
Carter Fisher
u r sick in the head :O
Jaxson Mitchell
I am sorry your newfaggotry got exposed. If you keep spamming the same shit over and over, maybe it will become a meme, my autistic friend :^)
Dominic Mitchell
DESU
Anthony King
Lord Kelvin, get
Blake Lewis
>typing 6 words into a search bar is autistic
Isaiah Miller
>Elementary particles are pointlike but have mass →→ infinite density
We model them as points when needed but they do have a finite radius. Also, energy density is a thing, not just volume density.
>two electrons close enough together to be within each other's event horizon
Their Schwarzchild radii are much smaller than their actual radii so the probability of this even occurring is negligible.
> It would again be a pointlike elementary particle because you can't tear apart or break up a black hole and look inside it.
Again, not pointlike. And black holes can't be torn apart or broken up because the potential well is massive, not because they themselves are pointlike.
>Naturally, it would also be stable. [citation needed]
Angel Perry
>but they do have a finite radius Indeed, [citation needed].
fug forgot to paste the abstract >In quantum mechanics, the concept of a point particle is complicated by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, because even an elementary particle, with no internal structure, occupies a nonzero volume.
