Does anyone have a Phd in physics, i have some interesting/retarded ideas related to superpositioning id like to discuss

Does a PhD in Physical Physics count?

I have a phD in shitposting, OP. Ask your question.

I have a theoretical degree in physics so ask away

what's the question...?

OP is dead

OP here:
is it possible for one cock to be in more than one place at a time so I can feel like I'm being gangbanged?

Left like 3 hours ago, thought this would get buried. Anyways, I was wondering a couple things,

>a.) If a Qubit would be considered a superposed particle

>b.) If all possible positions of a qubit could hypothetically exist on a physical plane. Possibly a "fourth dimmention". ( "The description of the two particles is much larger than the description of one particle—it is a function in twice the number of dimensions.")

>c.) If probability is an illusion caused by a linier perception of time.

>d.) If a an observed qubit deciding what position to be in creating a split in our dimmention of multiple possibility .

>f.) If we live in a dimmention of multiple possible quantum possibility .

>g.) If probability is boolean and possiblity is quantum.

a. qubits can be particles in superposed states. but many things can represent qubits. think about normal bits. a normal bit is a piece of information, and you can use a lot of things to represent this information.

b. yes, in quantum mechanics we often treat a particle's wavefunction as a point in a multidimensional eigenspace.

c. maybe you can formalize that idea into some interesting pop science but for now it's nonsense in its current language

d. yeah that's the many-worlds interpretation

f. wat

g. again wat.

you don't need a PhD for these answers, undergrad qm would suffice. the way you've worded these "questions" tells me you dont even have a basic understanding of quantum mechanics (yet! don't give up). i suggest you study a textbook rather than jumble together buzzwords

Are you nerds fucking triggered?

I hate to be this guy but...

>a physical plane.
>fourth dimmention
>quantum possibility

ITT yet again some self made genius tries to study quantum mechanics without math. Interest in modern science is great kids but come on!

I humbly admit that that's exactly what happened. There was math involved but ive been off concerta for too long for it to make any sense to me anymore.

I honestly just want to believe in the possibility that qubits can be observed in both states at the same time somehow. Without explaining anything I just called that hypothetical observable state the "4th dimmention". But think about it, if multiple particles with imaginary variables exist in reality, wouldnt that imaginary property be considered a 4th observable dimmention. Ya got length width depth and imagination :D. I know it seems stupid at first because its literally impossible to observe by our current understanding of everything. But I just think that if it can exist, it can be observed, just not by us. I really didnt want to go here, but think of a being that has the capabilities of observing both states of that Schrodinger thought experiment. Can someone please prove me wrong. It helps me learn.

>Can someone please prove me wrong. It helps me learn.
Here I go.

>think about it, if multiple particles with imaginary variables exist in reality, wouldnt that imaginary property be considered a 4th observable dimmention. Ya got length width depth and imagination :D.
In physics dimension means more "an attribute" than "a direction". I don't understand why they would be observable. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimensional_analysis

>it can be observed, just not by us. --- think of a being that has the capabilities of observing both states of that Schrodinger thought experiment.
...