Can someone explain to me how Quantum teleportation works ?

> Quantum teleportation is not a form of transportation, but of communication
how do you communicate without transporting the information from one place to another dummy ?

see

You are aware of the double slit experiment? Where you put light through a double slit and it miraculously creates either an interference pattern or just two slits of light, depending on whether you try to observe which slit the light goes through? It appears that the light goes through both slits as a wave, so long as you don't rig the slits with gear to detect which slit the light goes though.

If you do rig the slits, the light wave collapses into a single particle, a photon, and only goes through one slit at a time. Scientists have tried to rig this experiment to trick the universe into revealing which slit the light goes through AFTER the light has gone through the slits. They do this by diffracting the light through a crystal, which slits photons into entangled pairs that are each half as energised as the original photon. On photon is sent to the board to create a pattern, while the other is set to hit a detector BEHIND the board, via the use of mirrors. It turns out that even when doing this, the universe knows that you are observing the photons, and seems to retroactively change the pattern on the board to fit this.

In other words, quantum entangled particles have the power to rewrite the past.

Is there any video evidence of the observer effect of the double slit experiment
>In other words, quantum entangled particles have the power to rewrite the past.
0/10 Try harder next time.

I don't know about video evidence, but I do have a journal publication that was made about the phenomenon.

arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9903047v1

And here's a pop science video that explains quantum time traveling for dummies.

youtube.com/watch?v=8ORLN_KwAgs

There is zero evidence of any conscious observer effect. This is /x/ tier at best

I came here to post this.
First post best post.

I think a lot of confusion comes from the term "observer", which is admittedly a misleading term.

You are the only one ignoring evidence, here.

>ignoring evidence
There is no evidence retard
Show me the evidence for observer effect. Where is it ?

Resorting to name calling suggests that you are becoming defensive. You don't even know what you want to see. Proof of god? Some kind of "conscious observer"? That was never what anyone wanted to show you. Don't try to make everything about your preconceived notions. What you have been shown is that the universe will react to observation even if the observation hasn't happened yet, but is going to happen.

Thats not an argument, nor evidence for any of your stupid claims.

It is an argument. You're just ignoring it because you think I'm trying to prove something to you that I'm not. You've been shown a journal publication and a video for dummies. It would have taken you an hour to examine both. Instead you're wasting your time talking to me. I for one hope I'm not wasting my own time trying to explain this to you.

I said I want to see evidence for the 5000th time, with accountable citations from actual academic sources and cross-checkable charts and with video evidence, not a block of text that eventually says "this happened lol"

Don't come back from

Derailing the thread with fake autist comments for the 5000th time tonight? I still don't get what is fun about doing the same troll thing over and over again when it is way more fun to come up with new ones? At least for me anyway.

I never came from /x/, and the journal article I gave DOES provide charts, if you'd actually care to read it. It's a pretty famous article that kicked off a lot of follow up research, actually. If you'd read it, you'd understand that a video of the experiment is unnecessary, as that isn't what publications from 1999 tended to do in any case.

>troll thing
I just wanted you to show the evidence of your claims. And you proceeded to spam all kinds of shitposts except for a shred of evidence.

You seem incapable of backing up your paranormal claims with scientific evidence. If you had any evidence, you'd show it by now and there would be a scientific discussion already, but there isn't.
And because of that, you belong to

No you dont want evidence. You already have ignored everything and you will keep doing this. You just want to spam your posts, because thats your idea of "epic trolling".

Point me to that evidence with academic sources, cross-referenced charts and video evidence. Since you claim to have posted your evidence, I must have missed that. Let's see it.

You are being ignorant and you know it. That makes you a troll.

...

>show me your evidence
>y-you are being ignorant
typical /x/tard backpedalling when asked for evidence
For the 5000000000000000th time, I want video evidence of the observer effect experiment, cross-checkable charts and academic citations. Your "evidence" has none of them. Youtube videos with slideshows are NOT evidence for fucks sake.

I don't know user. Maybe you should go ask .

arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9903047v1

Also, litarally every textbook on quantum mechanics.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-slit_experiment

Link me to the video evidence of the observer experiment you fucking retard. Can you read the words of my posts ? We all know the wikipedia page on double slit, thats not what I asked.

Show. The. Video. Evidence. Of. The. Observer. Effect.

Fucking /x/tards are dumber than usual lately. Fuck knows what they're smoking.

What video evidence? Footage of what exactly? If scientific studies, a well established theory and decades of scientific experiments dont convince you, I cant help you

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observer_effect_(physics)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observer_(quantum_physics)

>I have evidence
>You don't want evidence
>You are being ignorant
and now
>What video evidence ?
There it is. You sure clinged on to your shitposting hard enough.

>posting wiki links again.
Yeah we all know these links. Reposting something else doesn't make you look like a smart ass. You've failed to provide any evidence of your bullshit even though it was so "well established".

Now remain in your cesspool and don't visit any science board again until you learn what evidence means.

Read these links man. They have your answer and contain lots of evidence, when you follow the references. You got your evidence. You wont get a video.

And again, what video evidence anyway? Since when is video evidence the only valid form of evidence in quantum mechanics? What is it exctly you want footage of? Subatomic particles?

I simultaniously want to see both the recording of the double slit diffraction pattern and the conscious observer recording their observations so I can check those recordings and see if the hypothetical observer effect is real. Ofcourse this would be just one sample so I want to see this experiment repeatedly, all with video evidence.
If this was so well established like earth being round, gravity or electromagnetism, there would be atleast one video evidence. But there isn't.

You know, you bashed and ignoed the wiki links. But you should honestly read them. You seem to be one of those people desribed by this user:
So please check
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observer_effect_(physics)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observer_(quantum_physics)

How many times do you need to hear this ? We're all aware of the links. We know what observer effect stands for. But we can't see any evidence of it for some reason.

Right nwo your claim is on par with the miracles of Jesus. There are tons of papers about it, just not any evidence.

You arent aware of those links apparently, since you keep talking gibberish. Open the links and actually read it