ITT: gibberish hacks

ITT: gibberish hacks

book cover gore thread?

...

1. ITT plebs
1.1 The plebs that are the totality of shitposts.
1.12. The plebs who make gibberish hacks threads on this Samoan kite flying forum while outing themselves as plebs.
2. What is then to be done other than saging and reporting?

...

...

>he doesn't think wittgenstein is a hack
>thinks he can calls anyone "a pleb"
K E K
E
K

...

Pic related, and everything he wrote.

>thinks he can calls
Very well done.

Also, if you'd read Wittgenstein you'd know he discussed his errors in PI.

Right or wrong, he still had more insight into language and thought than you dare admit.

>mfw i both books yesterday

RIP

Literally the triad of gibbersih

Is Bertrand Russell a gibberish hack?

All philosophers are gibberish hacks. Philosophy is just dumb pseudoscience stoner thoughts with no basis on fact. Total waste of time. Look into these things called 'Sciene' 'Logic' and 'Rationañity'

you're not funny, dude. sorry :(

This refers to everything post-portrait and the last chapter of portrait

>pseuds on this board WILL disagree with this

>anyone who disagrees with me is a pseud

>continental philosophy

Like every book in here is among my favorites ever.

That said... Wittgenstein is unreadable and I fail to understand where he even fits into the philosophical canon. He strikes me as overrated, I may be wrong.

>british philosophy

literally all psychoanalysis, critical theory, marxist bullshit, and continental philosophy in general.

>Finegans Wake isn't gibberish at its worst

>hegel, wittgenstein, kant
>all gibberish nonsense wankery lol
kill yourself
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

eric post, /b/ro

>:-D

>literally not what this thread is about

Psychoanalysis, critical theory, and marxism may not be OBJECTIVELY TRUE but they're rarely gibberish.
In fact they're so easy to understand that they've all been mainstreamed in one way or another.

Sageing? Where have you been the last years, a non? Moot's gone. .

>I MAY be wrong

My sides. Good one user.
wit fits with the analytics and russels attempt to show how logic is the basis for mathematics or some shit.
He presented the idea that the meaning of words is a result of their actual practical usage.
His critique was that philosophers take words and put them in an unnatural enviornment called philosoph inquiry.
Anyway, witt also helped destroy the positivist attempts like russel's in his later work(witt's work is drasticlly divided into two very different periods).

That which one cannot sage, one must not reply to.

This except science, logic and rationality are also for gays

also unironically stated