Should there be an IQ test to get into University?

Should there be an IQ test to get into University?

Anyone under 120 shouldn't bother.

Should there be an autism test to get into University?

Anyone who's like OP shouldn't bother.

>deriving your self-worth from how well you can recognize shapes on a test.

Guess who's not reproducing! Hint: OP

Holy this this whole thread is a meme.

This whole board is a fucking meme

OH GOD

Someone with an iq of 120 would know that limiting education is only going to increase the stupidity of the world.

Thats why i dont believe op is above iq 100

IQ is not static or something innate about a person.

IQ is pretty steady over a lifetime. Unfortunately, intelligence can't be improved much, if at all.

True that.
Currently developing methods to increase IQ.
(my aspie obession)

>tfw studying chemistry and IQ is 108

You're not one of those Jaeggi loving faggots are you? The dual-n-back and the rest of it is bullshit, as meta analysis has shown.

Doing badly, I presume?

> Should there be an IQ test to get into University?

No

> Anyone under 120 shouldn't bother.

It's called getting a Doctor's and it's a decent enough filter.

>Should there be an IQ test to get into University?
What good would that accomplish?
You'd be excluding people who were willing to put the time and effort in to keep up, and it's not like having a high IQ prevents people from being lazy assholes.

Starting last year of undergrad, GPA is 3.50. Pretty bad.

I've got a better idea:

Let everyone who can afford the time and money in, and then use a sort of grading system (let's call them grades) to determine who stays or not?

And if you're nearly a moron, like many jocks and at least one member of the Bush family, then you would have to possess a proven affiliation to a sports or political faction to continue...

Top kek
If you do that you have to fire 90% of educators

There already is the SAT, which is basically a glorified IQ test (minus spacial reasoning). However, there are many shitty colleges that don't really do much for you (and aren't respected) that will accept ~95% of applicants, and I would like to see some kind of warning to high schoolers. Same thing for certain majors that are easy but don't help you.

Unless your school has insane grade inflation or you are doing a dog shit easy major like psychology or english 3.50 is pretty good. Granted my example was a flagship public school with crazy grade deflation (especially for STEM), but my graduating class (in my major) had a mean gpa below 3.0.

Missed that you have a chemistry major. Depends on your school. If you go to Harvard, then yeah, 3.50 is below average (super duper grade inflation). If you go to a school with grade deflation (many flagship public schools, and some top tech schools (I think MIT, Caltech, etc. have really bad grade deflation too), then 3.50 isn't bad at all.

Bump

Shouldn't this be the opposite?
A lot of degrees are just pieces of paper that say you're willing to work in a terrible oppressive environment for at least 4 years
Why should we exclude those with lower IQs when those are the people who would need specialized education?
Wouldn't those with higher IQs not need as much education?

I.Q tests test how good you are at taking I.Q tests only.

Nice shitpost

>Anyone with a high school diploma can get a degree in STEM
You do know most niggers graduate high school right?

Realistically its anyone under 120 shouldn't bother with STEM

>I'm a loser who has nothing going for him in life but picking out pretty shapes.

KYS

how else can you convince them socialism is good if you don't provide them with a free education?

Does not pertain to Science or Math.

sage, reported

>tfw I haven't tested my IQ in ages and have no idea what it is
Does it even matter what your IQ is as an adult? Or is it a "my kid has potential" thing?

An IQ test just tests the brain on how well it can respond to quick puzzles however shows no similarities on how well someone is able to learn or use long term memory to solve a problem or how determined one person may be to succeed by putting in alot of time and effort.

IQ does not matter.

But op, why would you exclude yourself from uni?

Topkek

Mmhmm..then explain niggers.

IQ should be a factor at many things like being allowed to vote, reproduce or open a thread in sci. Not the sole one though.

Monkeys that have less hair and my bike.

In OP's case, it's:

>I could not score higher than 200 on all subjects of the SAT.
>My self proclaimed IQ is 120 so I should get in anyways.

If you score even around 110 in a "blind" IQ test (no practicing and without puzzle solving / memorization hobby) you are good to go for pretty much any higher education. Its merely an indicator that you are capable of logical thinking and not a complete retard. Rest is up to dedication and hard work.

citation needed

Bump

Don't bump this shit, you fucking dick swivel.

Bump

the SATs are effectively an IQ test.
Not exactly, some folks are bound to score higher than their IQ and others lower.
but it's practical enough I guess

We should use the proper thing.

He can recognize the fuck out of reproductive organs, though.

Which ones?

>implying OP isn't autistic