How do we stop him? Seriously, he's ruining young women everywhere. In today's culture...

How do we stop him? Seriously, he's ruining young women everywhere. In today's culture, it's rare enough to find a girl who reads, but when you actually find one, she reads John Green. Even fully grown adult women are reading his nonsense.

Unless we stop him, girls will get their idea of romance from guy who wrote a novel FOR TEENAGERS in which the main character, who greatly resembles John Green himself, gets a blowjob from and hot girl, then makes out with a different hot girl, the one he really loves, immediately after. They will get their crash course in history from a man who is ashamed to be a straight white male. They will get their sexual ethics from a man who would eat a bowl of Cheerios that 48 men have stuck their penises into. They will learn about literature from a man who called The Catcher in the Rye "profoundly and disturbingly misogynistic". Their idea of great literature will come from the guy who wrote, "If people were rain, I was drizzle and she was a hurricane."

I don't even know if he can be stopped, but we have to try. The future depends on it. Looking for Alaska is already being taught in public schools throughout America.

>fully grown adult women
There is no such thing.

Plebs will be plebs, you can't change that.

“The real heroes anyway aren't the people doing things; the real heroes are the people NOTICING things, paying attention.”
I fucking hate this guy

platitudes usually have a grain of truth to them but I'm not quite sure what this is even trying to convey.

>How do we stop him? Seriously, he's ruining young women everywhere. In today's culture, it's rare enough to find a girl who reads, but when you actually find one, she reads John Green. Even fully grown adult women are reading his nonsense.

I'd rather have stupid girls reading his books rather than having them reading the classics and then making stupid blogposts/reviews on them.

why?

Because it hurts to read them.

When you meet a man, you know it instinctively that he is a man and not some boyish imitation of masculinity, or a bundled collection of adultisms in the shape of a caricature of manhood.

With women it is the same way. So to distill the teaching of every great man in history: "Who cares what women think?"

so don't read them. Which should be easy for you.

Think about the stuff you read when you were younger. Do you really think you'd still be stimulated by it now?

Shitty YA literature gets people to read.
Some of them will go on to read better things and some will not. But the ones who stick with shitty books were never going to come our way anyway. People who want to find good ideas and good books will. It's not like they're hard to find.

This has no truth because its not a platitude. It is entirely idiotic and wrong.

Yes user, I kekd audibly at your reference to his Cheerios analogy, which you were going for I'm sure.

I can't help it. My curiosity compels me since I love reading what other people think about my favorite books.

>>>/reddit/

>They will get their sexual ethics from a man who would eat a bowl of Cheerios that 48 men have stuck their penises into

>"If people were rain, I was drizzle and she was a hurricane."
Never read any Green, but that was a painful sentence to read.

...

>“The real heroes anyway aren't the people doing things; the real heroes are the people NOTICING things, paying attention.”
lol, caricature of a man tries to justify his existence.

...

I didn't know Cheerios could give you STDs. I knew Kellogs was up to something sneaky...

i think he has played a good role in educating people about current events and such; i think he tries to throw out lots of points of view, which is important enough for a youtube history blogger

i was genuinely surprised when i found out that he was an author. made no sense to me.

>"The real heroes anyway aren't the people doing things; the real heroes are the people NOTICING things, paying attention. The guy who invented the smallpox vaccine didn't actually invent anything. He just noticed that people with cowpox didn't get smallpox."
>He just noticed that people with cowpox didn't get smallpox
Yeah, and that guy actualized this knowledge by DOING A THING, you goddamn retard.

lel

That is a false analogy. It would be more like, "imagine if there was one cheerio and 48 guys took turns putting it into their mouth and spitting it out. Would you want to be number 49?"

...

>...but that doesn't mean I don't genuinely enjoy your whole-grain crunch.
the result of at least three hours of freewriting

If I were a cute girl, I wouldn't want a man that sleeps around.

still can't see how anyone could call Catcher in the Rye misogynistic

lol

Bullshit. Men are respected and desired because the world yields to their powerful will and the more of the world that yields the more respected and desired they are.

Women are desired because they do not yield to the will of others. The more pleasure they abstain from and forego the more desirable they become. The weaker their will, the more cute and appealing they become.

Oh hi, r/theredpill

Wow that has really annoyed me, I feel like most of the girls I know would also be annoyed by that statement. I feel like plebs gonna pleb is accurate.

We should fuck him up though senpai, any ladies on here want to write a viral "open letter" to JG telling him he's a smarmy cunt and he's made them feel totally violated?

That rain line is really nice desu

John Green isn't a poor writer, just an overly celebrated and profoundly egotistic one

Any POCs on here want to say he spat on them on the bus?

Please kill yourself

Really though surely all smart people, as in your average smarty, just recognises this as garbage?

what the hell are you talking about senpai, he's completely right, like, in an objectively accepted by the majority of people kind of way

not a lot of people care about yella fellows so no help there

How do we stop him? Seriously, he's ruining young women everywhere. In today's culture, it's rare enough to find a girl who reads, but when you actually find one, she reads Peter Sotos. Even fully grown adult women are reading his nonsense.

Unless we stop him, girls will get their idea of romance from guy who wrote a novel FOR PEDOPHILES in which the main character, who greatly resembles Peter Sotos himself, gets a blowjob from and hot toddler, then makes out with a different hot toddler, the one he really loves, immediately after. They will get their crash course in pornography from a man who is ashamed to, uh, y'know... jerk off. They will get their sexual ethics from a man who would fuck a child that 48 men have stuck their penises into. They will learn about literature from a man who called 'Helping Your Child Recover from Sexual Abuse' "profoundly and disturbingly misogynistic". Their idea of great literature will come from the guy who wrote, "Can I suggest you... GET FUCKED."

I don't even know if he can be stopped, but we have to try. The future depends on it. The second issue of Pure is already being taught in public schools throughout America.

what is this meant to convey

Could you rephrase that question?

He's not wrong, in that sexual purity is basically imaginary.

But shaming people for adhering to sexual traditions is bad; comparable to mocking someone for religious beliefs.

>Kellogs
General Mills bro. Lrn2read cereal boxes.

But that's not comparable, women who sleep with a man aren't less valuable for it. You can't tell how many a woman has been with. There's no way to know.

Confidence is attractive to both genders, but it is much more important in a man than in a woman.

>>>>>>>>>

I literally looked up cheerios to make sure I would get the brand right before I posted that, but I somehow typed the wrong brand anyway :/. Looks like I flunked out of Veeky Forums.

I don't even know who this motherfucker is or what he's written or whatever, and that quote still makes me want to punch him in his fucking face.

hahahah, that is *literally* newspeak

>up is down
>left is right
>war is peace
>talkers are heroes
>doers are losers

>coward attempting to justify nonaction and insult men of action
Y-yeah! That's why I went to Canada instead of taking the chance that my draft number would be called! That's why grandpa pretended to have a limp so he wouldn't have to fight in Japan! He's the real hero you guys!

Is it any more imaginary than other social standards - like guilt or innocence? Sobriety or drunkenness?