Why do women have such shit taste

why do women have such shit taste

Women are actually better writers than men. Women are natural storytellers, due to the gossip in the tribe. So naturally their work reflects this gift. Male writers tend to make boring academic works that are too concerned with their own literary importance. Men also do not have much social talents and are more autistic than women who reflect the human experience in a more pure, accessible way.

>why do SOME women have such shit taste
>why do SOME men have such shit taste

fantasy/scifiplebshitmemepicture.jpg


Go here if you just want an opportunity to berate women:

Slechte schijtpaal.

It's a well known fact that on average women have a lower iq than men

Women actually have a nice taste to them.

You wouldn't know, though bc ur a virgen :^)

I'm actually just gay

I'm sure you're used to shit taste then

good one, but no, just dick

fucking faggot kill yourself degenerate piece of shit

kankerhomo

but i'm actually starting to enjoy my live somewhat again, maybe later

*teenage girls

#notallwomen

*middle-aged moms

Women have always and will always be worse than men in everything they do.
Prove me wrong, even "womanly" things such as cooking is done by men at the highest levels

Personally I like women.

why do men have such trouble thinking outside of in-groups?

A better question is why do all normalfags have such shit taste. Women are all de facto normies obviously, but the issue isn't their feminity but their normalfagottry

waarom het Nederlands?

Why do you have such shit taste in women?

Wow, what a faggot

Because romance and drama are the type of interests in women. But you don't like that type of writing, just like women don't like sci fi or escapism type books.

>50 shades of grey was a pretty good movie (sorry)

Drama is fine, it's just the shallow stupid shit that woman like.

Fifty shades is a trilogy?

>women
>experiencing the human condition

Kek

Well I like BDSM since I was 14, and its good erotica on some part. But I honestly think that romance can be compared to sci fi.
>men read sci fi to escape world problems
>women read romance because they love the fantasy of having a rich, strong, and handsome man

Kinda the same but not the same senpai

>men read sci fi to escape world problems
except sci fi is shit tier just like romance.

then you have an unbiased opinion

No, I already explained that I'm not into shallow shit like woman and manchildren.

>Women have always and will always be worse than men in everything they do.

Women are much better at being immoral, lying, manipulative, destructive, soul-crushing, treacherous, and subversive.

Men simply cannot compete. They are tame cucks by comparison and have ceded so much ground to women that the former have now begun to talk about how oppressed they are. Women are born physically weaker but have excelled in spite of this massive disadvantage.

>inb4 'muh morality'

Women are beyond good and evil

>inb4 'b-but I can rape you!'

You sure can, but the state, legal system, and cultural zeitgeist will take care of you as it has been utterly emasculated in favor of women

Your ressentiment against women speaks volumes about how impotent you are.

>0 proofs
literally not a job in the world woman are better at than men

>posts every Tom Clancy book

Why do men have such shit taste?

They don't need to be

What a ham-fisted attempt at using Nietzsche.

It's true though

ask the frogpeople on /r9k/ who has life on 'easy mode'

>fine with being inferior
truly a womanly thing to do

You're thinking in extremes rather than averages. It's only natural biologically and socially that exceptional individual individuals both in skill and recognition will be females. That doesn't make all men better cooks or all men more intelligent or all men whichever other positive value you attach to yourself and therefore attach to your gender.

Just because men can't be bothered with womens shit doesn't mean they're not better at any of those things. See cooking for example.

>a man won woman of the year
What else do men need to do?

>having men slave away for women's affection
>inferior

good one

They live, work, and breathe for 'women's shit' and recognition

That's why every women is running after succesful men trying to get a piece
good joke

I fail to see how that refutes anything I said.

Men are better at being manipulative and destructive on a grand scale, though.

I fail to see how men succesful men slave away for women.

Why do you think they work? What's their motivation for being successful?

>Women are much better at being immoral, lying, manipulative, destructive, soul-crushing, treacherous, and subversive.
That isn't even true tho. A women might fuck with a guy's life but it's men who crash the economy from financial scheming or start wars to enrich themselves or whatever.

How do we stop him? Seriously, he's ruining young women everywhere. In today's culture, it's rare enough to find a girl who reads, but when you actually find one, she reads Peter Sotos. Even fully grown adult women are reading his nonsense.

Unless we stop him, girls will get their idea of romance from guy who wrote a novel FOR PEDOPHILES in which the main character, who greatly resembles Peter Sotos himself, gets a blowjob from and hot toddler, then makes out with a different hot toddler, the one he really loves, immediately after. They will get their crash course in pornography from a man who is ashamed to, uh, y'know... jerk off. They will get their sexual ethics from a man who would fuck a child that 48 men have stuck their penises into. They will learn about literature from a man who called 'Helping Your Child Recover from Sexual Abuse' "profoundly and disturbingly misogynistic". Their idea of great literature will come from the guy who wrote, "Can I suggest you... GET FUCKED."

I don't even know if he can be stopped, but we have to try. The future depends on it. The second issue of Pure is already being taught in public schools throughout America.

woah..this is deep! men are crazy!

I used to think..that people who had power made bigger impacts on the world around them because of said power, now i realize it's fucking men!!

Men take pleasure in achieving things, this might be another reason why women are inferior?

They take pleasure in achieving things because they know their stock is raised with women which helps constitute their idealized self-image

You could just as easily argue that they accumulate women as status symbols and that their position relative to other men is if anything more important.

Their position relative to other men is only relevant if there's a woman to fight over.

You are severely underestimating sexual desire.

Read this.

It's unfair to generalize like this, there's plenty of intellectuals who while they enjoyed women separated their work from them entirely and did it for the pursuit of self, knowledge or whatever have you.

Not everyone is a petrarch or dante.

Literally never heard of him. Honestly, posting shit like that only gets more people interested with him than repulse them.

Only because men had the strength and willpower to seize power in the first place. Not that doing that is a good thing, but that's precisely how it came to be. But you can't really tell me women wouldn't fuck the world up on a grander scale if they had proportionally as much power as men. Look at the few women who are actually seizing power in the world. Look at Hillary Clinton. She's not exceptionally evil, she just has the position to cause destruction that most women wish they could have.

>It's unfair to generalize like this
You are in an identity politics men vs women thread. It's all we do in these, lad.
It would be like asking /pol/ to be nuanced in their arguments against blacks.

>there's plenty of intellectuals who while they enjoyed women separated their work from them entirely and did it for the pursuit of self

I'll concede that there have been great men who have refrained from being ensnared by woman; the asexual ones, the mad, etc.
But insofar as he is a sexual being and cares the slightest about woman, he is wholly under Woman's spell.

Woman is the sin of man

Threads like this make me realise that being a virgin isn't so bad.

This desu. Men are disgusting

But user, I'm a man.
I agree with you though. I haven't showered in a while.

>Vampires and bdsm is deep too guys

kek

As far as I'm concerned both sexes are equally foolish.

excellent post

>manchildren are often a larger target demographic than actual children for kiddie cartoons, video games and YA pulp fantasy

why do men have such shit taste

>Peter Sotos himself, gets a blowjob from and hot toddler, then makes out with a different hot toddler, the one he really loves, immediately after
Which book is this again?

Inferior people have inferior tastes, user.

>Women are natural storytellers

Women are natural talkers.

They suck ass at telling proper stories.

Women are legitimately a spook and doing things for them is retarded. Having had a girlfriend before it wasn't even woth it. More trouble than enjoyment.

Patriarchy is the reason

>Rekt

But do better in school and go to university way more? How does that work.

It's more women have a way stronger longing for children, and so don't value their career in the same way.

I don't massively like Sci fi, but why is it automatically shit? I've never got that. If a 10/10 writer wrote a sci fi book it would still be literary genius, no?

Stacys out

The school system has been adapted to cater to their interests. Prior to the sixties women sucked at school, because it was all geared towards how men learnt. Then they changed the ciriculuum to boost female test scores and just kept going in that direction despite the harm that it was doing to males. Go figure.

Also while women tend to do better in college and have more degrees the kinds of degrees that they are likely to get; Women, Gender, Porn Studies are useless and a sign of the degradation of higher learning and academia in general.

>muh male persecution complex

bet youre fighting off pussy with a stick nowadays

It's not that women have shit taste, it's that they have no taste whatsoever

>le funny looking man with hat meme

The feminization of education is an empirical fact. Our schools are run by women for girls

>le male disempowerment meme

Go spew your paranoid bullshit on /pol/ you fucking faggot

It's literally true

Women get higher grades
Women get into college more
Women tend to disproportionately work at schools, and women tend to disproportionately do better in school

Noticing literal facts doesn't make a person a /pol/ack

Maybe a lot of that is because most men are mouthbreathing mongoloids who will spend 50 years of their lives pushing lawnmowers, or will die at 20 in a desert being shot at by towelheads.

Maybe instead of being a paranoid MRA whos afraid of his own mom's voice, you could own up to the fact that most teenage boys are fucking stupid and neglect to give a fuck about school? Or do you want to continue spewing rhetoric about male victimization on an anonymous image board for anime? Youre an enormous loser either way, so take your pick.

4/10

>Men do something better than women
>HAHAHAHAHA TAKE THAT FEMINISTS

>Women do something better than men
>B-but the system is rigged!!!!! Men are at a disadvantage, its not fair!!!! :(

So instead of posting a counterpoint youre gonna take the meme route and just say "lol bait :)". Nice. You might as well have posted a Troll Face image.

Congrats on being wrong. Go back to your containment board, I'm sure there's an epic Male Rights thread going on and everyone is wondering where you are.

Men have 6.5x more grey matter thus more processing and cognition allowing men to have better taste.

KEK

who the fuck is this guy??

>points out that the person has no argument
>"congrats on being wrong"

how can somebody be wrong if they didnt say anything?

He's the dude who bankrolls political campaigns for Democrats.

But women have at least 6.5x more Shades of Grey matter

They fuck it up cause they're dumb, like inviting refugees.

Is this bait? He never said men were inherently superior. He stated that schools were originally geared towards men and their learning style, but now are geared towards women. That's not sexist, or paranoid. It would be sexist and paranoid if he said that all of this was part of some secret agenda to undermine men.

The counterpoint is easily argued; you discount the homosexual who is very well represented in arts and literature. Do you think Oscar Wilde spent all that time and effort writing plays and essays and short stories to get laid?

Moreover, the man who finds sex and sexual partners with ease doesn't worry about them, much like a starving man thinks being well-fed is the !most important thing in the world while his rich counterpart only thinks of food in an experiential or sensual way. To put it bluntly, undersexed men think the only reason anyone does anything is to get laid. Lord Byron fucked basically every attractive woman in London as a break from his more serious work of writing poems, and later fighting in other countries' wars. Pussy was not his raison d'etre, or at least not in the way you imagine.

As a parting shot, I urge you to consider Alexander. I'm sure the Prince of Macedonia had all the Mediterranean booty he could want, but he drove his armies to conquer out of the thrill of battle and perhaps the jouissance of conquest in the abstract. The thrill of power is more seductive than the thrill of pussy.

>The thrill of power is more seductive than the thrill of pussy.

>t. permavirgin

Nice one bud.

I'll go dominate my 10/10 gf's fat arse now, while you contemplate the imaginary "power" you think you have.

>>>tumblr

Everyone has shit taste other, other than me of course.
I wish more women would actually admit they watch porn so they didn't have to hide behind the "no this is just a book teehee."