>book features a female character
>she's rational
Book features a female character
Who are you quoting?
No one?
>it's the 'greentexts are quotes' meme
Reply to this post in less than 30 seconds or you will die tonight
safe
Don't tell me what to do
Not replying to him...
okay buddy okay
yes
>book features a white male character
>he doesn't spend all his free time watching cuck porn on xhamster
spotted the redditor
thoughts on soap, fellow redpiller?
Bollocks
yess
Nice argument there, bucko.
Save me pupper.
>anyone who isn't a cuckold fetishist is a redpiller
This is literal reddit logic
>book features a female main character
>she is not only rational, but intelligent and courageous and a mary sue
Don't people hate Jonathan Franzen precisely because he doesn't do this?
triple nigger
>it's a book
>male characters are rational
>rational is seen as a positive without further deconstruction
Psueds are so stupid.
fuck
>guy makes a post
>he's a dumb frogposter
>we need to like, deconstruct things, you know?
oh hi sophomore philosophy major
yo
OH SHIT
>book features a female character
>she is sqrt(2)
>book features characters
If literatire highlights intelligence as a positive without any conflict or introspection of what that means, what any concept within the narrative means; it's shit literature and you shouldn't be reading it. If you want to continue reading it, you shouldn't be posting here.
aasas
dumb frogposter
damnit
>book is in the distant future
>men are anything but sperm dispensers
oooooooooo
kek
not scared
or am i
fuck you