explain this
Explain this
Josiah Evans
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
nature.com
sciencedirect.com
sciencedirect.com
science.sciencemag.org
nature.com
pnas.org
genome.cshlp.org
nature.com
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
sciencedirect.com
gr.iqsociety.org
emilkirkegaard.dk
twitter.com
Brayden King
I seriously doubt russians have high IQs like that. The Africa part seems right though.
Julian Nelson
1. Correlation doesn't imply causality.
2. Biased researchers. Richard Lynn (mentioned in that picture) is a well-known racist.
Blake Ward
not an argument
Ryan Campbell
nutrition, environment, culture and poverty affect the variable of IQ. it's even listed in the comment.
Jaxon Rivera
>1. Correlation doesn't imply causality.
True but you don't know what that sentence means.
>2. Biased researchers. Richard Lynn (mentioned in that picture) is a well-known racist.
>I will disregard any evidence that counters my preconceived beliefs.
It is you who is biased.
Gavin Cook
If you're dumb, you'll get the wrong nutrition
If you're dumb, you won't use your lands to farm for food&veggies, if the environment is unsuitable you'll move elsewhere
If you're dumb, you'll create a dumb culture
If you're dumb, you'll be a poor loser.
Your desperate attempts to strip the human element from human properties like IQ is hilarious.
Jack Powell
>correlation doesn't imply causation
>starts to list bullshit reasons because of correlation
good job
Jayden Thomas
Some populations are smart, some are not. What is there to explain?
Jeremiah Sanchez
>Assertions about DNA (i.e. genome wide assertions about polygenes) can be made by just looking at skin tone.
Literally an infographic that only a retard would make and be convinced by.
kys yourself, OP.