>In sensible circles, Veeky Forums is dismissed for its racism, its porn of dubious legality, its gore- and furry-oriented content. But it does differ from board to board. If you avoid /b and /pol the experience is similar to Reddit, only less smug and repulsive. The /lit board is credible, and populated with snarky and adorable MFA-types. When they aren’t bitching about Tao Lin (who allegedly posts on the board) or decrying DFW as pleb-tier, the /lit community often provides valuable insights and recommendations
>tfw read Stoner after seeing it recommended here then was able to school my pretentious aunt who thinks I'm a deadbeat on it as she read it almost a year later made me smile
Brody Nguyen
Ooh. Yeah that's true. Veeky Forums also has a bunch of failed stem fags that read lit to compensate for their failures by broadening their knowledge base.
Leo Rogers
>2 years ago
dumb frogposter
Nathan Ward
Most are just NEET though.
Christopher Wright
...
Sebastian Barnes
That's an altogether too generous assessment, the valuable insights are few and far between. But it's true that user has turned me onto a few good books.
