Race and IQ

>Blood types don't stop being real just because people with different blood types can have less genetic dissimilarities than people with the same blood type
People who have the same blood type have the same genes with regards to those that create their blood type.

That's the cause dumb poltard.

I haven't read much about this topic, and tbqh, I don't really care to, but from my understanding, I believe that there may be some very minor differences in the brain between different races. If you've noticed, there are a few very noticeable physical differences between the different races. If there are physical differences, then logic can only lead me to conclude that there are probably mental differences as well. Though, I actually don't believe that these differences can be terribly negative. Like, for example, one race may have, on average, a better visual memory than the others after adapting to an environment that requires that.
Differences in the subspecies of animals would also be quite larger, because they aren't as mobile, and they don't wipe each other off the face of the earth like we do.
I think it would be far more benificial to study the differences in the races, and tailor an education system that recognises that, and then have the different races work jobs that are more suited to their qualities rather than to teach all races the exact same stuff. Give them the choice, too.

You also have failed to read.

I never said humans can't have subspecies. People DO have genetic differences, they just don't correspond to race. Race is a layman's opinion, not a scientific category.

>It's called a definition. Having black skin and "black" features is the definition of the black race. Which definition may or may not be stupid, sure, but it's undeniably based on genetics.
This applies to my 'ginger' definition as well. "I define it as this so we should study it" is not a valid justification for making a clade. If you want to argue otherwise you can devote your life to that. But before you waste your time I think you should know that "black" isn't even monophyletic, so it would be a fool's errand.

Yes
Every mammal (with the exception of some predators) is domesticable
And European herbivores were harder to domesticate than african ones (see Aurochs)

Then answer is D, anybody who says other wise is a retarded subhuman

Wild move to call someone presumably white dumb, when your race sucks at solving these. You can practice IQ tests in jail atleast :)

D

>Which definition may or may not be stupid, sure, but it's undeniably based on genetics.
No. It's based on arbitrary opinion.

By that definition people with largely African ancestry, but albinism are now white. People with primarily western European ancestry, but a tan are now black.