Ahem! Now that I have seen a good deal of threads DISMISS the exposed irRATionalwiki for the irrational leftist propaganda machine that it is, which is no better than NEOCONservapedia I might add, how about we all FINALLY have a serious discussion on this book right here.
Anyone read this book? It answers the so-called answers that the mainstream media used to "discredit" the 9/11 truth movement's findings.
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
twitter.com
>jet fuel can't melt steel beams
>>jet fuel can't melt steel beams
it can't though bro.
>Plane crashes into buliding
>Surprisingly it doesn't fall down
>Second plane flies intro buildings
>Motherfucker still doesn't fall down
>Shit-hot fires weaken the steel in the remaining building
>Building finally collapses
How much of a retard do you have to be to think the above is impossible?
>Building finally collapses
youtube.com
What has that got to so with anything?
>Without strategically placed exposives
>Building finally "nicely" collapses
>Gravity points downwards
>No other forces acting on building, or at least no large forces
>One floor collapses
>Pushes floor below passed its safety margin
>Second floor collapses
>Repeat
>Result: Building collapses, mostly, into its own footprint
Basic physics tells that we should expect a building to collapse like the towers did, unless there was a poor attempt at controlled demolition.
Do you realize how long that would have taken, how many people you would need, and how much explosives you need for a building the size of the twin towers?
Look at the size of the buildings in your stupid demolition video. Now scale that up about 100 times.
>get chocolate bar
>leave in in hot place
>not fully melted, but really gooey and soft
White hot steel is still solid, but is very malleable.
If this was a special case of "no other forces acting on building", why did it colapse in t~=(2 * height_of_building / g)^1/2?
yes, but, whole building was not on fire.
They admitted building 7 was rigged for controlled demolition. They claimed they did it because it was in danger from the towers falling. Their claim suggests they rigged the building WHILE the twin towers were on fire!!! People tend to forget about building 7 because it doesn't make any sense.
>People tend to forget about building 7
Actually WTC 7 is a red herring to draw attention away from the two big towers that were apparently micronuked.
The asbestos towers had to come down no question, the real problem was the demolition of the western constitutions in that process. As you can see they slapped a new money tower up real quick, the constitutions restored not so fast.
Reminder to sage.
Either this is you posting on the wrong board or this thread is actually a discussion on your extra chromosome and tenth generation of inbreeding.
daily schizo thread
go back to or
honestly i had better expectations from Veeky Forums, but then i think that this site is mostly american so...
Why do you say that? Even mainstream scientists say, that they need evidence in order to change their perceptions of reality. A notion that I don't disagree with at all. Admittedly, there are loonies within the truth movement but some are scientists who have found some things that quite add up when you take the official theory into account, but do add up when you consider the remote piloted plane/sleeping gas theory.
For instance, we know steel doesn't have to melt in order to break, as some of the more tasteful debunkers pointed out, but why were there molten pools of steel at the bottom of Ground Zero?
We know that you don't have to be a professional pilot to crash... But how come one of the planes did some sort u-turn maneuver that only professional air force pilots know how to pull off, when the pilots in question flunked pilot school miserably?
And why does Osama Bin Laden where gold rings in some of his videos when it is against his literalist and fundamentalist view of the Koran? Supposing that the fundamentalist terrorist muslims were fighting for their variation of their religion, would that not make them hypocritical?
Why were some of the 16 hijackers still alive and well in their homes? Seriously, they turned on their tvs, and were all confused about what was going on when saw their pictures and names on 9/11 news reports.
Let's not forget about the BBC reporting about the attacks like hours earlier before they actually happened.
Or how about Bennhezir Bhuto claiming in an interview about Osama Bin Laden being already dead and killed by some guy I didn't even hear about?
Then you also have to take into account the possibility of the possible shadow government withholding secret devices that allow an operator to mask the vocal tone and inflections of a loved family member. Like Todd Beamer's "Let's roll" comment and dialogue that he apparently exchanged with his family while supposedly fighting terrorists on board flight 93.
Citation needed on all of those.
Aye, but if take into account the Annunaki, then anything is possible.
Teleporters, stealth gizmos like that suit in the metal gear games, and of course drones, which in the remote plane/sleeping gas theory, were used used as the Boeing were secretly crafted to be overided with a remote control from over 500 yards away. We know drones exist now, so this theory is a little more plausible.