>Character has startling blue or grey eyes
Character has startling blue or grey eyes
but you have black eyes pepe
>character has glowing red eyes
>He had a thin mawkish nose situated on a rather beaky face with squinty eyes that weren't too squinty but just kind of squinty and his chin perkled out upwise toward his brow which gave him the appearance of a cornish hawk from the glenview islands of pitcairn row and he was standing in a glen aboard a copse in a field of kennerson's lilacs which ascended deeply from a stipple of trees dotting the ridge in the middle of a chalk cliff that sloped eastward to a set of hills
>character has startling blue and grey eyes
>character has "fair" skin
Can we stop using that word? It makes it seem like whiteness is somehow the objectively preferable skin color.
>character has bowling ball eyes
I hate it when authors describe what characters look like. I never imagine them in my head like they're described and I could give myself a headache actually trying to imagine what someone looks like who is "of the highest degree of middle stature; his limbs were put together with great elegance, and no less strength; his legs and thighs were formed in the exactest proportion; his shoulders were broad and brawny, but yet his arm hung so easily, that he had all the symptoms of strength without the least clumsiness. His hair was of a nut-brown colour, and was displayed in wanton ringlets down his back; his forehead was high, his eyes dark, and as full of sweetness as of fire; his nose a little inclined to the Roman; his teeth white and even; his lips full, red, and soft; his beard was only rough on his chin and upper lip; but his cheeks, in which his blood glowed, were overspread with a thick down; his countenance had a tenderness joined with a sensibility inexpressible," or whatever the fuck.
>character is implied to exist within the context of the story and isn't just a theoretical person agreed to exist by the other characters
...